> On Jul 10, 2014, at 21:32, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
>
> Tubes have been largely Glyph's effort (though a lot of people have
> contributed in one way or another). And a large effort it's been.
> Development is proceeding in a Twisted branch and comes to over three
> thousand lines of
I would suggest including the Twisted support inside tubes as a first
pass, restricted to a module (e.g. tubes.helical). Less overhead and as
long as it's optional it's not preventing anyone from using tubes with
other frameworks.
Otherwise, +100.
_
> On Dec 11, 2014, at 6:55 PM, Itamar Turner-Trauring
> wrote:
>
> I would suggest including the Twisted support inside tubes as a first pass,
> restricted to a module (e.g. tubes.helical). Less overhead and as long as
> it's optional it's not preventing anyone from using tubes with other
>
> On Dec 11, 2014, at 6:00 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
>
>
>> On Dec 11, 2014, at 6:55 PM, Itamar Turner-Trauring
>> wrote:
>>
>> I would suggest including the Twisted support inside tubes as a first pass,
>> restricted to a module (e.g. tubes.helical). Less overhead and as long as
>> it's op
A helix is twisted but isn't necessarily a tube. Macaroni on the other
hand...
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Christopher Armstrong <
ra...@twistedmatrix.com> wrote:
>
>
> > On Dec 11, 2014, at 6:00 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Dec 11, 2014, at 6:55 PM, Itamar Turner-Trauring <
> it
