On Aug 18, 2014, at 2:25 PM, Daniel Sank wrote:
> It's just like the case of a GUI and a business logic object. The GUI
> probably gets a reference to the business logic object so that eg. button
> pushes can invoke methods on the object. However, that reference should
> probably be weak so t
On Aug 18, 2014, at 8:31 PM, Daniel Sank wrote:
> Dustin,
>
> > Adding what amounts to a use-after-free bug to the protocol seems like a
> > really bad idea to me.
>
> Oh goody, a sarcastic comment which doesn't actually bother to explain the
> bug :)
Oddly this is _exactly_ how a co-worker
On 03:31 am, sank.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
Dustin,
Adding what amounts to a use-after-free bug to the protocol seems like
a
really bad idea to me.
Oh goody, a sarcastic comment which doesn't actually bother to explain
the
bug :)
Sarcastic? What? Dustin *was* explaining the problem. Witho
On Thu, 14 Aug 2014 14:29:56 -0700
Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
> On Aug 11, 2014, at 6:51 AM, c...@webprojekty.cz wrote:
>
> > Hello, I've been playing with the new tubes that are being
> > implemented:
> > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.twisted/27248
> > https://twistedmatrix.com/trac/t
On Aug 19, 2014, at 5:05 AM, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
> On 03:31 am, sank.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Dustin,
>>> Adding what amounts to a use-after-free bug to the protocol seems like a
>> really bad idea to me.
>>
>> Oh goody, a sarcastic comment which doesn't actually bother to explain
