Hi everyone,
I think I've hit one of those cases where AMP really seems to want
everything (locator, receiver, sender) to be an instance of t.p.amp.AMP :-(
I've written some code that tries to multiplex stream transports over AMP:
https://github.com/lvh/txampext/blob/multiplexing/txampext/multi
On Sep 30, 2013, at 2:45 AM, Laurens Van Houtven <_...@lvh.io> wrote:
> What am I doing wrong? Is this a bug?
I think it's pretty clearly a bug. Calling the argument "proto" in the first
place indicates the nature of the confusion.
There are parts of the flow here from bytes to method executi
On Sep 29, 2013, at 2:49 AM, Hynek Schlawack wrote:
> I have that on my todo-list since the beginning of time but never got around
> to it.
Do you have a link to a Nevow bug in some tracker (launchpad, perhaps?) that is
tracking this?
-glyph
___
Tw
Am 30.09.2013 um 20:42 schrieb Glyph :
>> I have that on my todo-list since the beginning of time but never got around
>> to it.
>
> Do you have a link to a Nevow bug in some tracker (launchpad, perhaps?) that
> is tracking this?
Yes, I believe it’s https://bugs.launchpad.net/nevow/+bug/10910
Hi Glyph,
Thanks for your response!
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Glyph wrote:
> On Sep 30, 2013, at 2:45 AM, Laurens Van Houtven <_...@lvh.io> wrote:
>
> What am I doing wrong? Is this a bug?
>
>
> I think it's pretty clearly a bug. Calling the argument "proto" in the
> first place indicat
On Sep 30, 2013, at 11:51 AM, Hynek Schlawack wrote:
>
> Am 30.09.2013 um 20:42 schrieb Glyph :
>
>>> I have that on my todo-list since the beginning of time but never got
>>> around to it.
>>
>> Do you have a link to a Nevow bug in some tracker (launchpad, perhaps?) that
>> is tracking thi
On Sep 30, 2013, at 12:09 PM, Laurens Van Houtven <_...@lvh.io> wrote:
> Hi Glyph,
>
> Thanks for your response!
>
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Glyph wrote:
> On Sep 30, 2013, at 2:45 AM, Laurens Van Houtven <_...@lvh.io> wrote:
>
>> What am I doing wrong? Is this a bug?
>
> I think it
