Ok, will try AMP
thank you very much!
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Glyph wrote:
>
> On Mar 31, 2013, at 6:09 PM, Todong Ma wrote:
>
> I wrote a simple client and server to get system information (e.g. cpu,
> memory, etc.)
> Client send 'cpu' to the server, then server will return cpu's inf
On behalf of Twisted Matrix Laboratories, I am pleased to announce the
release of Twisted 13.0.
Among the 70 tickets closed, we can see:
* A new "Introduction to Deferreds" document that you can find here:
http://twistedmatrix.com/documents/13.0.0/core/howto/defer-intro.html
* A fix in twisted
Am 02.04.2013 um 16:32 schrieb Glyph :
>> My question can be simplified to: Closures yes or no?
> "As appropriate".
I had that coming. :)
[…]
Thanks for your verbose explanations!
>> If “yes, closures”: Still using cb/eb prefixes? I don’t see them very often
>> in recent examples. What about
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Glyph wrote:
>
> On Apr 1, 2013, at 2:34 PM, Shell wrote:
>
> I propose that IUsernamePassword should be split into at least two
> interfaces:
>
> * IUsernamePassword, with only username and password, no methods,
> which allows password to be used in any way
> * A
Hey everyone,
During the latest release process, I was left with several things to
clarify, so now that it's done I think it's time:
* We started building wheels for Windows. What do we do with me, should
we upload it to pypi? What happens when users try them?
* Glyph mumbled something about s
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Thomas Hervé wrote:
> * Glyph mumbled something about sha sums of the release files, instead
> of md5. Should we pursue that? We may need to update some trac
> integration code.
>
Depends, what's the goal of the checksums? If it's "we want people to be
able to ch
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Thomas Hervé wrote:
> * Glyph mumbled something about sha sums of the release files, instead
> of md5. Should we pursue that? We may need to update some trac
> integration code.
>
>
+1 for SHA-256 or SHA-512. High profile collision attacks against MD5 have
happene
On 04:36 pm, _...@lvh.cc wrote:
>On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Thomas Hervé wrote:
>> * Glyph mumbled something about sha sums of the release files,
>>instead
>>of md5. Should we pursue that? We may need to update some trac
>>integration code.
>
>Depends, what's the goal of the checksums? If i
On Apr 3, 2013, at 4:11 AM, Thomas Hervé wrote:
> On behalf of Twisted Matrix Laboratories, I am pleased to announce the
> release of Twisted 13.0.
Thank you Thomas for managing yet another excellent release!
> Among the 70 tickets closed, we can see:
>
> * A new "Introduction to Deferreds" do
On Apr 3, 2013, at 4:25 AM, Hynek Schlawack wrote:
> So you’re cool with calling callbacks after the event that triggered? That
> would’ve been my second question but I didn’t want it to divert the
> discussion. I kind of like `onData` et al too but the Twisted examples rather
> shun it.
The
On Apr 3, 2013, at 9:14 AM, Thomas Hervé wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> During the latest release process, I was left with several things to
> clarify, so now that it's done I think it's time:
>
> * We started building wheels for Windows. What do we do with me, should
> we upload it to pypi? What
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 10:51 PM, wrote:
> The question relates to step 4 beneath "Cut the tarballs & installers":
>
> http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/wiki/ReleaseProcess#Cutthetarballsinstallers
>
> The checksums are intended to let people verify their download was
> neither accidentally corrupted
Yay! Thanks, Thomas and everyone who contributed to this release :)
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Thomas Hervé wrote:
> On behalf of Twisted Matrix Laboratories, I am pleased to announce the
> release of Twisted 13.0.
>
> Among the 70 tickets closed, we can see:
>
> * A new "Introduction to
On Apr 3, 2013, at 1:51 PM, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
> On 04:36 pm, _...@lvh.cc wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Thomas Hervé wrote:
>>> * Glyph mumbled something about sha sums of the release files,
>>> instead
>>> of md5. Should we pursue that? We may need to update some trac
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Glyph wrote:
> The release manager already _does_ sign something. Since PyCon, we do
> have much better trust web integration, which is great, but that's not
> really relevant to this discussion, which is just about changing what we
> sign and how it gets signed.
On Apr 3, 2013, at 3:23 PM, Laurens Van Houtven <_...@lvh.cc> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Glyph wrote:
> The release manager already _does_ sign something. Since PyCon, we do have
> much better trust web integration, which is great, but that's not really
> relevant to this discu
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Laurens Van Houtven <_...@lvh.cc> wrote:
> Is the accidental corruption thing a real risk? I thought that was the
> point of, say, TCP checksums :) Perhaps I'm just mistaken as to how often
> his happens in the wild...
>
TCP checksums don't protect you against cor
17 matches
Mail list logo
