Re: [Twisted-Python] TestCase methods names

2011-03-19 Thread Glyph Lefkowitz
On Mar 18, 2011, at 9:36 PM, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote: >> In concrete, I say that we should: >> >> - Deprecate those names that are deprecated in Python 3 (I mean, still >> provide the functionality, but with a DeprecationWarning) >> >> - Stop using them in internal code. >> >> - Fix do

Re: [Twisted-Python] Benchmark of Python WSGI servers

2011-03-19 Thread Glyph Lefkowitz
On Mar 18, 2011, at 9:35 PM, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote: > A multi-process WSGI container might actually be of practical use, since > it may make more cores available to your server. If an application is > bottlenecked on CPU rather than some high-latency operation (as you can > only proc

Re: [Twisted-Python] TestCase methods names

2011-03-19 Thread Laurens Van Houtven
I'm with JP, but a reasonable warning should be important, yes. cheers lvh ___ Twisted-Python mailing list Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python

Re: [Twisted-Python] Benchmark of Python WSGI servers

2011-03-19 Thread Michael Thompson
On 19 March 2011 08:29, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote: > On Mar 18, 2011, at 9:35 PM, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote: > > A multi-process WSGI container might actually be of practical use, since > it may make more cores available to your server.  If an application is > bottlenecked on CPU rather than som

Re: [Twisted-Python] Benchmark of Python WSGI servers

2011-03-19 Thread Itamar Turner-Trauring
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 20:54 -0400, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote: > My pet theory is that it has something to do with transferring data > from threads to the I/O loop via queue synchronization, and not being > as smart as it could be about buffering, and that particular technique > getting slammed really

Re: [Twisted-Python] Best strategies for pb Referenceables running long methods from callRemote

2011-03-19 Thread exarkun
On 02:06 am, charlesso...@gmail.com wrote: >Thanks for the reply. I am using twisted conch to connect to the >remote >machines and start these tests, I am thinking that instead of using one >connection for all testing I will open a new connection (and thus a new >python) for each test. I'm not s

Re: [Twisted-Python] Best strategies for pb Referenceables running long methods from callRemote

2011-03-19 Thread Charles Solar
Ah no, I use conch to connect to the remote machines. My conch code starts a remote python instance and runs some bootstrapping python code which connects to the PB Root. Once connected I send the test code to the remote process and start testing with PB. When the PB remote method (remote_execut

Re: [Twisted-Python] Best strategies for pb Referenceables running long methods from callRemote

2011-03-19 Thread exarkun
On 06:48 pm, charlesso...@gmail.com wrote: >Ah no, I use conch to connect to the remote machines. My conch code >starts >a remote python instance and runs some bootstrapping python code which >connects to the PB Root. Once connected I send the test code to the >remote >process and start testing

Re: [Twisted-Python] Benchmark of Python WSGI servers

2011-03-19 Thread Glyph Lefkowitz
On Mar 19, 2011, at 8:39 AM, Michael Thompson wrote: > I agree that threads and processes is going to be the first step to > scaling but I don't think there's much advantage putting that in > twisted given that there are other solutions for this. Other solutions for what? If Twisted is going to

[Twisted-Python] Weekly Bug Summary

2011-03-19 Thread exarkun
Bug summary __ Summary for 2011-03-13 through 2011-03-20 Opened Closed Total Change Enhancements: 19 43692-24 Defects: 14 30516-16 Tasks: 2 3 6

Re: [Twisted-Python] Weekly Bug Summary

2011-03-19 Thread Glyph Lefkowitz
On Mar 20, 2011, at 12:05 AM, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote: > Total:35 76 1271-41 Wow. This was an _impressive_ sprint. Thanks to everyone who participated. ___ Twisted-Python mailing list Twisted-Python@twiste