On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz
wrote:
> On Jan 20, 2011, at 11:20 PM, Tom Davis wrote:
>
> I definitely agree that resolving the low-hanging fruit first is a good
> idea. For finishing "docs branch X" to make sense, my personal belief is
> that X should:
>
>- Still be releva
In this thread, I hope to find a resolution to the issue of the Finger
tutorial and efforts to sufficiently improve it or remove it.
In the course of reviewing documentation-related tickets, I stumbled upon
#1148 (http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/ticket/1148). Therein, Glyph first(?)
put down a lot o
On Jan 22, 2011, at 3:18 PM, Tom Davis wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz
> wrote:
> On Jan 20, 2011, at 11:20 PM, Tom Davis wrote:
>
> If branches that are out there don't meet these standards, commenting on
> their tickets and getting them deleted or closed as invali
Bug summary
__
Summary for 2011-01-16 through 2011-01-23
Opened Closed Total Change
Enhancements: 3 6690 -3
Defects: 6 8547 -2
Tasks: 2 7 6
>
> Mean open ticket age: 1032 days
Mean time between ticket creation and ticket resolution: 238 days
Mean time spent in review: 83 days
Wow. Adding "reduce these by at least one order of magnitude" to my todo
list. Gotta have goals!
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 12:05 AM, wrote:
> Bug summary
>
On Jan 23, 2011, at 12:36 AM, Tom Davis wrote:
> Mean open ticket age: 1032 days
> Mean time between ticket creation and ticket resolution: 238 days
> Mean time spent in review: 83 days
>
> Wow. Adding "reduce these by at least one order of magnitude" to my todo
> list. Gotta have goals!
Du
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz
wrote:
>
> On Jan 22, 2011, at 3:18 PM, Tom Davis wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz > wrote:
>
>> On Jan 20, 2011, at 11:20 PM, Tom Davis wrote:
>>
>> If branches that are out there *don't* meet these standards, commenti
