Is there an easy way to make a task.Cooperator instance only execute N
ticks / sec, summed across all iterators it's driving? So if you add two
iterators, they each run at N/2 per sec, 3 at N/3, etc.
It seems like this ought to do it:
N =
def myScheduler(x):
# reschedule N times per second
On 09:41 am, p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
>Is there an easy way to make a task.Cooperator instance only execute N
>ticks / sec, summed across all iterators it's driving? So if you add
>two
>iterators, they each run at N/2 per sec, 3 at N/3, etc.
>
>It seems like this ought to do it:
Very close!
On 01/10/10 13:46, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
> On 09:41 am, p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
>> Is there an easy way to make a task.Cooperator instance only execute N
>> ticks / sec, summed across all iterators it's driving? So if you add
>> two
>> iterators, they each run at N/2 per sec, 3 at
On 30/09/2010 18:01, Phil Mayers wrote:
> It is more than a little confusing, and I'm sure frustrating.
>
> I've tried to produce something like this locally, but cannot.
The very first message in this thread (28th Sept, 14:48) and my email of
30th Sept, 14:36 both had scripts attached which do e
On 12:58 pm, p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
>On 01/10/10 13:46, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
>>On 09:41 am, p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
>>>Is there an easy way to make a task.Cooperator instance only execute
>>>N
>>>ticks / sec, summed across all iterators it's driving? So if you add
>>>two
On 01/10/10 14:19, Chris Withers wrote:
> On 30/09/2010 18:01, Phil Mayers wrote:
>> It is more than a little confusing, and I'm sure frustrating.
>>
>> I've tried to produce something like this locally, but cannot.
>
> The very first message in this thread (28th Sept, 14:48) and my email of
> 30th
Hi Glyph,
On 30/09/2010 19:52, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
>> File "Twisted-8.2.0-py2.5-linux-x86_64.egg/twisted/internet/base.py",
>> line 757, in runUntilCurrent
>> call.func(*call.args, **call.kw)
>> File "test_looping.py", line 24, in __call__
>> del self.connector
>> exceptions.AttributeError: Bre
On 01:30 pm, ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
>Hi Glyph,
>
>On 30/09/2010 19:52, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
>>>File "Twisted-8.2.0-py2.5-linux-x86_64.egg/twisted/internet/base.py",
>>>line 757, in runUntilCurrent
>>>call.func(*call.args, **call.kw)
>>>File "test_looping.py", line 24, in __call__
>>>del se
On 01/10/2010 15:00, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
>> I hope this helps, do let me know if I should add it to an issue
>> somewhere...
>
> Can you at least provide a traffic capture recording an instance of this
> happening?
I'm afraid not, I didn't have the forsight to do this at the time, and
Thanks, that explains everything. The code I was using to test was copied
from Twisted's daemonizing function:
http://github.com/powdahound/twisted/blob/master/twisted/scripts/_twistd_unix.py#L155-169
It should probably be updated before more users upgrade to the new kernel
and run into this issue
I'm really pulling my hair out here. The code in question uses getPage:
http://gist.github.com/607124
If I remove the postdata argument to getPage no problem (except the postdata
is required by server I'm calling). However, no matter what I put in
postdata, I get this:
http://gist.github.com/607
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 01:01, Jason J. W. Williams
wrote:
> I'm really pulling my hair out here. The code in question uses getPage:
> http://gist.github.com/607124
> If I remove the postdata argument to getPage no problem (except the postdata
> is required by server I'm calling). However, no matte
12 matches
Mail list logo
