On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
> Presumably the future plan is to have IPositioningProvider that receives
> data from something other than NMEA, as well? (Other GPS protocols,
> whatever cell phones give you for triangulation, skyhook, etc.)
Yep, that's the idea.
> A min
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Laurens Van Houtven wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Glyph Lefkowitz
> wrote:
> > I've attached a sketch
> Extremely helpful, thank you.
You're welcome.
> To be honest, it
> still looks kind of wonky that a LineReceiver (well, a subclass)
> delegates
Oh, by the way: would you guys expect NMEASentences to be immutable objects?
I suppose it makes sense, but maybe I've been thinking too much
Haskell recently. After all, an NMEASentence is an alternative way of
describing a past event (namely, something that a GPS told you).
Changing it would be l
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Laurens Van Houtven wrote:
> Oh, by the way: would you guys expect NMEASentences to be immutable
> objects?
>
Yes, but by convention, not necessarily by enforcement. The really
important thing is that the framework should not share or mutate
NMEASentence objects
Hello list!
This is my first post, and I would like to join in the discussion :).
Laurens Van Houtven wrote:
> Okay, I'll do that as soon as people have reviewed the changes
> suggested in your last mail, so that I know I got it right :-)
>
I agree with Glyph suggestions.
NMEAAdapter should d
Hello all,
I have been prodded by the members of #twisted into rewriting the
Deferred documentation. You can check out the plan at this
ticket:
http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/ticket/3943
Comments would be appreciated.
Cheers,
Edward
P.S. If you reply on the mailing list, please CC me.
___
Hi Edward,
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Edward Z. Yang wrote:
> I have been prodded by the members of #twisted into rewriting the
> Deferred documentation. You can check out the plan at this
> ticket:
>
> http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/ticket/3943
>
> Comments would be appreciated.
Your outl
Hello,
I am writing some scraper scripts and need to pass them through an
intercepting proxy. getPage does not support a proxy argument and this code
I found on internet won't work with SSL proxy (stalls indefinitely):
def getPage(url, contextFactory=None, *args, **kwargs):
scheme, host, port
This looks really great...looking forward to the results!
Kevin Horn
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Jamu Kakar wrote:
> Hi Edward,
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Edward Z. Yang wrote:
> > I have been prodded by the members of #twisted into rewriting the
> > Deferred documentation. You
Excerpts from Jamu Kakar's message of Thu Jul 30 15:03:16 -0400 2009:
> Your outline looks nice. Something that *really* helped me a lot
> with Deferreds was seeing how they are modelled after standard
> Python flow control behaviour. I guess that's what the first
> section your proposing is abou
> Right. Everything you could do synchronously, you can do asynchronously
> (and a bit more too). It just /looks/ really weird.
At some point I realized that it helps to realize that code that looks
synchronous really isn't at all. Probably all the programming that almost
all of us will ever do
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Terry Jones wrote:
> > Right. Everything you could do synchronously, you can do asynchronously
> > (and a bit more too). It just /looks/ really weird.
>
> At some point I realized that it helps to realize that code that looks
> synchronous really isn't at all. P
2009/7/31 ezyang :
> Excerpts from Jamu Kakar's message of Thu Jul 30 15:03:16 -0400 2009:
>> Jono Lange gave a presentation recently (can't remember what it was
>> called... maybe something about being an evil hacker or about how
>> your code sucks and he hates you) where he presented step-by-step
Am 30.07.2009, 23:45 Uhr, schrieb Kevin Horn :
> Thanks for this, Terry. I'd never thought of it that way, and it's
> quite a
> good point.
I agree. I've come to think it's partially a fault of using normal text
based editors. Those fit the programming models from 30 years ago well,
but to
Hi, and welcome to the discussion :-)
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Santiago
Aguiar wrote:
> NMEAAdapter should delegate to a IPositionReceiver (which should be a
> Receiver, right? It's called Provider, maybe I'm missing something?),
Yes, it's been called IPositioningReceiver and IPositioning
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Hudson"
To: "Twisted general discussion"
The accompanying paper is here: http://mumak.net/stuff/twisted-intro.html
Thanks for this incredibly helpful link!
-Dave
___
Twisted-Python mailing list
Twisted-Pyt
Hi everyone,
I would like to help Twisted by adding documentation or reviewing existing
documentation. However, I don't see many (any?) unassigned tickets regarding
documentation of specific items, and because I am quite new to Twisted this
makes it hard for me to determine where you wish I would
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:49:54 -0400, Jessica McKellar
wrote:
>Hi everyone,
>
>I would like to help Twisted by adding documentation or reviewing existing
>documentation. However, I don't see many (any?) unassigned tickets regarding
>documentation of specific items, and because I am quite new to Twi
On Jul 30, 2009, at 11:35 PM, Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
> Here are a few tickets in particular which I think it would be
> worthwhile to
> resolve:
>
>http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/ticket/1136
>http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/ticket/1627
>http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/ticket/3784
>
Steve.
Same thing happened to me. In my case it was corrected by a page refresh.
Kevin Horn
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Steve Steiner (listsin) <
list...@integrateddevcorp.com> wrote:
>
> On Jul 30, 2009, at 11:35 PM, Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
> > Here are a few tickets in particular wh
On Jul 30, 2009, at 11:51 PM, Kevin Horn wrote:
> Steve.
>
> Same thing happened to me. In my case it was corrected by a page
> refresh.
Yah, it's just a little scary when Twisted's own site does things like
this.
S
___
Twisted-Python mailing l
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Steve Steiner
(listsin) wrote:
>
> On Jul 30, 2009, at 11:51 PM, Kevin Horn wrote:
>
>> Steve.
>>
>> Same thing happened to me. In my case it was corrected by a page
>> refresh.
>
> Yah, it's just a little scary when Twisted's own site does things like
> this.
>
the following classes:
twisted.cred.credentials.CramMD5Credentials
twisted.mail.imap4.PLAINCredentials
twisted.mail.imap4.LOGINCredentials
all seem to implement the same interface, yet there is no Interface defined
for these objects.
"But Kevin", you might be thinking, "They all implement
twiste
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:49:54 -0400, Jessica McKellar <
> jessica.mckel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Hi everyone,
> >
> >I would like to help Twisted by adding documentation or reviewing existing
> >documentation. However, I don't see many (
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:31 AM, Kevin Horn wrote:
> the following classes:
>
> twisted.cred.credentials.CramMD5Credentials
> twisted.mail.imap4.PLAINCredentials
> twisted.mail.imap4.LOGINCredentials
>
> all seem to implement the same interface, yet there is no Interface defined
> for these obje
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Glyph Lefkowitz
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:31 AM, Kevin Horn wrote:
>
>> the following classes:
>>
>> twisted.cred.credentials.CramMD5Credentials
>> twisted.mail.imap4.PLAINCredentials
>> twisted.mail.imap4.LOGINCredentials
>>
>> all seem to implement th
26 matches
Mail list logo
