I have been able to reproduce the same results with a simple C++
example. I have been unable to find any specific reason why binding to
"127.0.0.1" and later calling getsockname would result in a different
address of "0.0.0.0" I did find one reference [1] that said that using
a port number of 0 wil
Sorry, forgot to attach the C++ example.
-Aron
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Aron Bierbaum wrote:
> I have been able to reproduce the same results with a simple C++
> example. I have been unable to find any specific reason why binding to
> "127.0.0.1" and later calling getsockname would resul
