Landreville wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 2:16 AM, Andrew Bennetts
> wrote:
> > twisted-...@udmvt.ru wrote:
> > [...]
> >> Is it true, that adding many callback functions as filters is elegant,
> >> but impractical solution?
> >> Since there is only a [linear] list of pairs (callback, errback)
> "Alexey" == twisted-web writes:
Alexey> Is it true, that adding many callback functions as filters is
Alexey> elegant, but impractical solution?
Many callbacks as a filter is elegant & practical.
But there's a difference with errbacks, as people are touching on. That's,
with a bit of han
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 2:16 AM, Andrew Bennetts wrote:
> twisted-...@udmvt.ru wrote:
> [...]
>> Is it true, that adding many callback functions as filters is elegant,
>> but impractical solution?
>> Since there is only a [linear] list of pairs (callback, errback), the last
>> errbacks
>> have to
twisted-...@udmvt.ru wrote:
[...]
> Is it true, that adding many callback functions as filters is elegant,
> but impractical solution?
> Since there is only a [linear] list of pairs (callback, errback), the last
> errbacks
> have to be complex to distinguish the failures, that came from the previo
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 05:46:08PM -0500, Terry Jones wrote:
> > "Michael" == Michael P Soulier writes:
>
> Michael> I'm a bit confused as to the "visual explanation". It seems like
> Michael> if you have a single callback and errback, that if the errback
> Michael> wants to swallow the error
On 29/01/10 Tristan Seligmann said:
> Just to expand on exarkun's answer a little, it might help to
> understand that addCallback and addErrback are simply implemented in
> terms of addCallbacks. Roughly:
>
> def passthru(arg):
> return arg
>
> d.addCallback(cb) is equivalent to d.addCallbac
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 12:39 AM, wrote:
> There are at least three ways you can have a single callback and
> errback:
>
> d.addCallback(cb)
> d.addErrback(eb)
>
> or
>
> d.addErrback(eb)
> d.addCallback(cb)
Just to expand on exarkun's answer a little, it might help to
understand that ad
> "Michael" == Michael P Soulier writes:
Michael> I'm a bit confused as to the "visual explanation". It seems like
Michael> if you have a single callback and errback, that if the errback
Michael> wants to swallow the error, the callback will not be called at
Michael> all, since deferred proce
On 10:28 pm, msoul...@digitaltorque.ca wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I've been reading up on this
>
>http://twistedmatrix.com/documents/current/core/howto/defer.html
>
>I'm a bit confused as to the "visual explanation". It seems like if you
>have a
>single callback and errback, that if the errback wants to sw
