On 04:03 pm, doug.farr...@gmail.com wrote:
>Jean-Paul,
>
>Thanks for the "heads up", that certainly falls under the D'OH!
>category. Would you have any suggestions for how I might do this kind
>of thing?
I already mentioned SynchronousDeferred, so I guess you're not
interested in that. :)
The
Hi Doug.
I think that a decorator is a fairly nice idea, however you will
probably run into the following issue:
http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/ticket/2066
Once a reactor has been started and stopped, starting the reactor again
will crash your program. You will need to come up with a way to get
On 02:32 pm, doug.farr...@gmail.com wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I'd like to get some comments on the code below (including, "don't be
>a bonehead!" ). I'm trying to write a API library for database
>access that can be used by both synchronous (non-twisted, no reactor)
>code and asynchronous (twisted, with r
