eld) many times (why not?).
>
>
>
>
>
>I have deal with Task-based programming and async functions (mechanism
>similar to Deferred and inlineCallbacks decorated functions in Twisted)
>in
>Microsoft .NET.
>
>MS people have implemented Task (analogue of Deferred) i
:43 PM
To: ser...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Twisted-Python] inlineCallbacks: multiple yielding same
Defferred behaviour
The short answer is that those models don't support chaining the way
Deferreds do, IIUC.
I think a very similar thing was a bonus question at the tutorial Stephen
Thorne
T.
MS people have implemented Task (analogue of Deferred) in the way I
described.
From: Laurens Van Houtven [mailto:_...@lvh.cc]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 12:47 PM
To: ser...@gmail.com; Twisted general discussion
Subject: Re: [Twisted-Python] inlineCallbacks: multiple yielding same
Deffer
I'm not entirely sure why you feel this is unintuitive or why you should
need a workaround; in any other case, deferreds work pretty much the same
way.
When reading this code, the first question that pops up in my head is: why
are you doing this instead of just using the result that you already ha
