On 6 March 2015 at 14:06, Adi Roiban wrote:
> I don't care what standard is used, just make sure that it is not
> stated on a page with 99% of obsolete info and in a section named
> "XHTML Layout" like it is now on
>
<3
Enforcement by tooling would be better again.
_
I don't care what standard is used, just make sure that it is not
stated on a page with 99% of obsolete info and in a section named
"XHTML Layout" like it is now on
https://twistedmatrix.com/documents/current/core/development/policy/doc-standard.html
You can continue to argue for getting rid of s
On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 at 20:49 Glyph wrote:
[snip]
> So... give it another 10 years, and the open source community may have
> cracked the code of line-wrapping at run time :-).
>
>
This email made my morning.
jml
___
Twisted-Python mailing list
Twisted-Py
> On Mar 4, 2015, at 10:20 PM, Hynek Schlawack wrote:
>
> On 5 Mar 2015, at 2:14, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
>
>> I find the "semantic newlines" standard which we have been attempting to
>> enforce for documentation a constant source of annoyance.
>>
>> Ostensibly, the purpose of using semantic n
On 5 Mar 2015, at 2:14, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
I find the "semantic newlines" standard which we have been attempting
to enforce for documentation a constant source of annoyance.
Ostensibly, the purpose of using semantic newlines is to reduce the
size of diffs. However, given that we have oce
> On Mar 4, 2015, at 8:14 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
>
> I find the "semantic newlines" standard which we have been attempting to
> enforce for documentation a constant source of annoyance.
>
> Ostensibly, the purpose of using semantic newlines is to reduce the size of
> diffs. However, give
> On 5 Mar 2015, at 09:14, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
>
> I find the "semantic newlines" standard which we have been attempting to
> enforce for documentation a constant source of annoyance.
>
> Ostensibly, the purpose of using semantic newlines is to reduce the size of
> diffs. However, given t
