Are you sure IOCP is able to share sockets between process? It
would be great if you can share some info about this. I only use
No, I am not sure. But this SO reply seems to suggest
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14388706/socket-options-so-reuseaddr-and-so-reuseport-how-do-they
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Gelin Yan wrote:
>
> 2015年11月15日 下午6:09，"Tobias Oberstein" 写道：
> >>
> > What's required for high-performance on Windows is the Twisted IOCP
> reactor. For Python 2 that works quite well. For Python 3 some bits are
> missing in Twisted (Hawkie is working on that).
2015年11月15日 下午6:09，"Tobias Oberstein" 写道：
>>
> What's required for high-performance on Windows is the Twisted IOCP
reactor. For Python 2 that works quite well. For Python 3 some bits are
missing in Twisted (Hawkie is working on that). For shared sockets (which
Crossbar.io uses for multi-core scalin
Hi Tobias
Have you tried to test crossbar on windows? I heard that stdio
Yes, I have tried that;) Crossbar.io supports Windows!
performs very bad on windows. I noticed crossbar use pipe to transfer
data between process.
Only for control/management: that is traffic between the node con
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Tobias Oberstein <
tobias.oberst...@tavendo.de> wrote:
> Those are some nice numbers, to be sure! Twisted really benefits from
>> running in a pypy vm. I have read that pypy still doesn’t optimize
>> old-style classes as efficiently as new-style classes; I wonder
Those are some nice numbers, to be sure! Twisted really benefits from running
in a pypy vm. I have read that pypy still doesn’t optimize old-style classes
as efficiently as new-style classes; I wonder if there would be any meaningful
change in the metrics if resource.Resource was a new-style
Hi Tobias,
> On Nov 10, 2015, at 4:54 PM, Tobias Oberstein
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> maybe it's of interest how far it's possible to drive Twisted Web on modern
> multi-core CPUs.
>
> Here are 2 data points from measuring:
>
> * 627990 HTTP requests/s at 360 us avg latency
> * 12.6 GB/s HTTP rep
