On Oct 6, 2009, at 11:25 PM, Andrew Bennetts wrote:
> Steve Steiner (listsin) wrote:
> [...]
>> I expect the usual flurry of "you must post your exact code or we
>> can't help you at all, moron" posts, but...
>
> I'll try to restrain myself ;)
Thanks, I appreciate your restraint. Must say
On Oct 6, 2009, at 10:57 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
However, you can experiment with it pretty easily using
DeferredSemaphore: http://twistedmatrix.com/documents/8.2.0/api/twisted.internet.defer.DeferredSemaphore.html
Cool, I didn't know about that, I'll give it a look. Thanks!
If your app
Steve Steiner (listsin) wrote:
[...]
> I expect the usual flurry of "you must post your exact code or we
> can't help you at all, moron" posts, but...
I'll try to restrain myself ;)
> In spite of my not having posted specific code, could someone with
> some actual experience in t
If everything is happening in a single thread, you probably don't need to
lock anything, because there's no shared access and therefore no race
conditions. I have no idea how your app is written, so you may need them -
I don't know. Just an observation.
- Matt
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 11:13 PM,
On Oct 6, 2009, at 11:00 PM, Matt Perry wrote:
> One thing of note is that you say you have concurrency issues
> handled -- but with asynchronous I/O, there are no concurrency
> issues, since there's no concurrency (at least, not at application
> level). This is confusing at first but it's
Your limit will usually be the number of file descriptors in the system,
which can be usually changed via ulimit or your system's equivalent. On
Linux I believe it defaults to 1024, so you should be able to handle 1024
simultaneous connections.
One thing of note is that you say you have concurren
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Steve Steiner (listsin) <
list...@integrateddevcorp.com> wrote:
>Should I limit the number of "in-flight" pages?
>
I'm not going to comment on that, because I don't know what your app is
doing or why it appears to be dying. As you said, you didn't post c
