On 10/01/2010 02:27 PM, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
> On 12:58 pm, p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
>> On 01/10/10 13:46, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
>>> On 09:41 am, p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
Is there an easy way to make a task.Cooperator instance only execute
N
ticks /
On 12:58 pm, p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
>On 01/10/10 13:46, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
>>On 09:41 am, p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
>>>Is there an easy way to make a task.Cooperator instance only execute
>>>N
>>>ticks / sec, summed across all iterators it's driving? So if you add
>>>two
On 01/10/10 13:46, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
> On 09:41 am, p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
>> Is there an easy way to make a task.Cooperator instance only execute N
>> ticks / sec, summed across all iterators it's driving? So if you add
>> two
>> iterators, they each run at N/2 per sec, 3 at
On 09:41 am, p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
>Is there an easy way to make a task.Cooperator instance only execute N
>ticks / sec, summed across all iterators it's driving? So if you add
>two
>iterators, they each run at N/2 per sec, 3 at N/3, etc.
>
>It seems like this ought to do it:
Very close!
