On Jun 9, 2010, at 6:04 PM, Ray Cote wrote:
> So, one positive vote for removing 2.4 support in Windows.
> I prefer your Windows support be focused moving forward to 2.7.
Since Ray was the first sponsor of 2010, as well as a silver sponsor - see the
AppropriateSolutions logo on the front pag
We have quite a bit of Twisted/Windows code and it has all been ported over to
2.5 or 2.6.
I find it easier to upgrade Pythons on Windows since the bulk of our Windows
products are shipped as py2exe containing their own interpreter. Cleaner than
dealing with CentOS (for example) which has 2.4
On Jun 9, 2010, at 3:29 PM, Kevin Horn wrote:
> It would be nice to keep it if possible, but if it's a choice between a
> buildslave for 2.4 and one for 2.7, then 2.7 really needs to take priority.
Well, you can make it possible by volunteering the hardware :). I just don't
think we should thi
Me 3. Existing apps wont likely care about new features and if they
need then upgrade to 2.5 is fully backwards compatible
2010/6/9, Glyph Lefkowitz :
>
> On Jun 9, 2010, at 12:20 AM, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
>
>> I would like to propose that after Twisted 10.1 is released, we cease to
>>
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 11:20 PM, wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I would like to propose that after Twisted 10.1 is released, we cease to
> claim support for Python 2.4 on any version of Windows. This seems
> reasonable to me considering that Python 2.5 was first released in
> September of 2006 and that e
On Jun 9, 2010, at 12:20 AM, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
> I would like to propose that after Twisted 10.1 is released, we cease to
> claim support for Python 2.4 on any version of Windows. This seems
> reasonable to me considering that Python 2.5 was first released in
> September of 200
