On 3 October 2017 at 00:09, Glyph wrote:
>
[snip]
> I remember there was a PB based channel for communicating with Trac
> but I can't find where it is defined.
> I see that kenan is using something [1] BOT_PORT = 15243, I can't find
> where a service with that port is started.
>
>
> The PB inter
> On Oct 2, 2017, at 2:48 AM, Adi Roiban wrote:
>
> On 1 October 2017 at 20:09, Glyph wrote:
>> On Oct 1, 2017, at 12:06 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
>>
>>
>> Rather than write a bot specific to Twisted, why not just adapt the Twisted
>> project to use a bot written by another project?
>>
>>
On 1 October 2017 at 20:09, Glyph wrote:
> On Oct 1, 2017, at 12:06 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
>
>
> Rather than write a bot specific to Twisted, why not just adapt the Twisted
> project to use a bot written by another project?
>
>
> Personally I don't care either way :-). I was just describing
> On Oct 1, 2017, at 12:06 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
>
> Rather than write a bot specific to Twisted, why not just adapt the Twisted
> project to use a bot written by another project?
Personally I don't care either way :-). I was just describing my understanding
of the existing plan, not end
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Adi Roiban wrote:
>
>
> orking on a bot to re-open pull requests when a submitter posts a "please
> review" comment: https://github.com/markrwilliams/txghbot
Rather than write a bot specific to Twisted, why not just adapt the Twisted
project to use a bot writte
> On Sep 30, 2017, at 3:14 PM, Adi Roiban wrote:
>
> I am restarting this discussion
> https://twistedmatrix.com/pipermail/twisted-python/2016-May/030333.html
>
> I am starting a new thread since I want to keep the focus on the
> review process / workflow / markers, and not on the things requi
