Re: [Twisted-Python] qt4 reactor status

2010-06-30 Thread Glenn Tarbox, PhD
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Steve Castellotti wrote: > On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 23:04 -0700, Glenn Tarbox, PhD wrote: > > Any of the code that was developed while the reactor was in Twisted > itself is MIT licensed. Perhaps that means you only need to track down > people who contributed afte

Re: [Twisted-Python] qt4 reactor status

2010-06-29 Thread Steve Castellotti
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 23:04 -0700, Glenn Tarbox, PhD wrote: > Any of the code that was developed while the reactor was in > Twisted > itself is MIT licensed. Perhaps that means you only need to > track down > people who contributed after the code was moved

Re: [Twisted-Python] qt4 reactor status

2010-06-29 Thread Glenn Tarbox, PhD
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:43 AM, wrote: > On 07:58 am, s...@puzzlebox.info wrote: > > > > I might attach a request to the last ticket in the tracker as a > >start, and see if that gets any response. I'm only a user of Twisted > >and > >don't feel comfortable directly hassling folks who were k

Re: [Twisted-Python] qt4 reactor status

2010-06-29 Thread Steve Castellotti
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 12:43 +, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote: > On 07:58 am, s...@puzzlebox.info wrote: > > > > I might attach a request to the last ticket in the tracker as a > >start, and see if that gets any response. I'm only a user of Twisted > >and > >don't feel comfortable direc

Re: [Twisted-Python] qt4 reactor status

2010-06-29 Thread exarkun
On 07:58 am, s...@puzzlebox.info wrote: > > I might attach a request to the last ticket in the tracker as a >start, and see if that gets any response. I'm only a user of Twisted >and >don't feel comfortable directly hassling folks who were kind enough to >donate their time to its development.

Re: [Twisted-Python] qt4 reactor status

2010-06-29 Thread Steve Castellotti
First off, many thanks for the responses everyone, they are certainly appreciated! Comments below. On 06/27/2010 08:37 PM, Robert Kern wrote: >> One issue with "official" support is PyQt licensing. If PySide is (or >> becomes) an alternative, the licensing issue would disappear and

Re: [Twisted-Python] qt4 reactor status

2010-06-27 Thread Robert Kern
On 2010-06-27 18:51 , Glenn Tarbox, PhD wrote: > One issue with "official" support is PyQt licensing. If PySide is (or > becomes) an alternative, the licensing issue would disappear and Twisted > "could" include it in the distribution. Phil Thompson provides an exception to the GPL license that

Re: [Twisted-Python] qt4 reactor status

2010-06-27 Thread Glenn Tarbox, PhD
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 3:37 PM, wrote: > On 26 Jun, 06:03 pm, s...@puzzlebox.info wrote: > >Hello- > > > > I'm wondering if anyone can fill me in on the current status and > >plans for Qt support under Twisted? > > I think you nailed the status - it's an externally maintained reactor > which

Re: [Twisted-Python] qt4 reactor status

2010-06-27 Thread exarkun
On 26 Jun, 06:03 pm, s...@puzzlebox.info wrote: >Hello- > > I'm wondering if anyone can fill me in on the current status and >plans for Qt support under Twisted? I think you nailed the status - it's an externally maintained reactor which probably works for some people. As far as plans for su

[Twisted-Python] qt4 reactor status

2010-06-26 Thread Steve Castellotti
Hello- I'm wondering if anyone can fill me in on the current status and plans for Qt support under Twisted? I've been working with PyGTK for most of my cross-platform applications over the past decade or so, but mainly for license reasons and to be honest GTK+ still looks pretty much