On 14 August 2016 at 11:38, Adi Roiban wrote:
> On 14 August 2016 at 00:40, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
>> Just a bit of Github housekeeping: Appveyor has looked pretty stable (more
>> than our other Windows builds, even). I'm thinking about making it a
>> required status for merging. But I'm curi
On 14 August 2016 at 00:40, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
> Just a bit of Github housekeeping: Appveyor has looked pretty stable (more
> than our other Windows builds, even). I'm thinking about making it a
> required status for merging. But I'm curious what other folks have seen on
> PRs I might not
Just a bit of Github housekeeping: Appveyor has looked pretty stable (more than
our other Windows builds, even). I'm thinking about making it a required
status for merging. But I'm curious what other folks have seen on PRs I might
not have looked at; is it pretty reliable at this point?
Also: