Re: [Twisted-Python] making appveyor a required status

2016-08-17 Thread Adi Roiban
On 14 August 2016 at 11:38, Adi Roiban wrote: > On 14 August 2016 at 00:40, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote: >> Just a bit of Github housekeeping: Appveyor has looked pretty stable (more >> than our other Windows builds, even). I'm thinking about making it a >> required status for merging. But I'm curi

Re: [Twisted-Python] making appveyor a required status

2016-08-14 Thread Adi Roiban
On 14 August 2016 at 00:40, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote: > Just a bit of Github housekeeping: Appveyor has looked pretty stable (more > than our other Windows builds, even). I'm thinking about making it a > required status for merging. But I'm curious what other folks have seen on > PRs I might not

[Twisted-Python] making appveyor a required status

2016-08-13 Thread Glyph Lefkowitz
Just a bit of Github housekeeping: Appveyor has looked pretty stable (more than our other Windows builds, even). I'm thinking about making it a required status for merging. But I'm curious what other folks have seen on PRs I might not have looked at; is it pretty reliable at this point? Also: