> If you can write some unit tests for this, turn the whole thing into a
> patch (using svn diff), and attach it to ticket #4632, that'd be great.
>
> Jean-Paul
>
done!
___
Twisted-Python mailing list
Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com
http://twistedm
On 10:22 am, smagafu...@naumen.ru wrote:
>Thanks to all!
>Especially to Yaroslav Fedevych who explain me my misstake in my native
>language :)
>I was wrong with deferreds usage.
>
>Cascading cancelling of inlineCallbacks is still needed to me, but it
>can be realized with current Deferred API.
>
Thanks to all!
Especially to Yaroslav Fedevych who explain me my misstake in my native
language :)
I was wrong with deferreds usage.
Cascading cancelling of inlineCallbacks is still needed to me, but it
can be realized with current Deferred API.
This way for example:
class InlineCallbacksMa
On Aug 17, 2010, at 12:46 AM, Yaroslav Fedevych wrote:
>
> On Aug 17, 2010, at 8:49 AM, Sergey Magafurov wrote:
>
>> ... lots of text skipped ...
>
> You are currently considering your task from the viewpoint “let's make a
> callback chain for the perfect workflow and alter this chain in case
You are currently considering your task from the viewpoint “let's make a
callback chain for the perfect workflow and alter this chain in case of
anything going wrong.” I think the flaw with this approach is that you are
trying to make your “ideal” flow work at all in situations where it would
On Aug 17, 2010, at 8:49 AM, Sergey Magafurov wrote:
> ... lots of text skipped ...
You are currently considering your task from the viewpoint “let's make a
callback chain for the perfect workflow and alter this chain in case of
anything going wrong.” I think the flaw with this approach is tha
Some mistake fixes in my previous message
> @inlineCallbacks
> def acquire_tts_for(self, call):
> tts_connection = yield self.tts.acquire_connection(timeout=10) #
> may raise TimeoutError inside
> yield call.make_audio_link_with(tts_connection, 'in', timeout=10)
> # may raise TimeoutError
First, generally: the most important thing to provide here are unit
tests with very clear documentation expressing why you would want
these things to work. The test code you provided is unclear because
it does not succeed or fail, it just does some things, and then does
some other things, wi
On Aug 16, 2010, at 1:34 AM, Sergey Magafurov wrote:
> At first, sorry for my bad english
No problem, Sergey. I am sure that my Russian would be worse.
Ivan's response already covered a lot of the things I would say, but I did want
to add a few things.
First, generally: the most important thi
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 08:34, Sergey Magafurov wrote:
> Wanted features:
> 1. Ability to delete callbacks (delCallbacks)
> 2. Automatic cancelling Deferreds if they are not needed any more (no
> callbacks registered any more, all was deleted)
> 3. Ability to add/del hooks on deferred's finishing
At first, sorry for my bad english
I will try to explain idea about Deferreds and inlineCallbacks
Wanted features:
1. Ability to delete callbacks (delCallbacks)
2. Automatic cancelling Deferreds if they are not needed any more (no
callbacks registered any more, all was deleted)
3. Ability to add/
11 matches
Mail list logo
