Re: [Twisted-Python] feedback on next version of Fireshark using twisted framework....

On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Glyph wrote: > Actually, you're better off using twisted.python.filepath.FilePath.child :). > > That documentation has quite the personality. ___

Re: [Twisted-Python] feedback on next version of Fireshark using twisted framework....

On May 3, 2012, at 2:12 PM, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: > you're better off using os.path.join Actually, you're better off using twisted.python.filepath.FilePath.child :). HTH, HAND, -g

Re: [Twisted-Python] feedback on next version of Fireshark using twisted framework....

thanks for the feed back Jasper! More feedback welcome. Yes the code def. needs to be cleaned up before public release, and I will make more use of python libs for path concatenation. The feedback I'm specifically looking for is anything related to how I'm using twisted and process management. The

Re: [Twisted-Python] feedback on next version of Fireshark using twisted framework....

You seem to have some indentation issues. You have a random assortment of Python style issues (some lines end with a semicolon). You use 'foo' + '/' + 'bar' to generate paths. While not evil (I think all major platforms will support that and do the translation on their own), you're better off using

[Twisted-Python] feedback on next version of Fireshark using twisted framework....

Hi I have an open source project that is pretty well-known in the security community. http://www.fireshark.org it's a service wrapper that runs a headless version of firefox to visit malicious sites to store telemetry data. The old service used PERL for threading (very painful), so a while ago I c