On 8 September 2016 at 03:16, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
>
> On Sep 7, 2016, at 6:49 PM, Amber Brown wrote:
>
> They actually build wheels now (lol), the builder having some upgrades has
> meant that the whl has a different name (cp27-cp27m, not cp27-none). I
> noticed it last night, just went to bed
> On Sep 7, 2016, at 6:49 PM, Amber Brown wrote:
>
> They actually build wheels now (lol), the builder having some upgrades has
> meant that the whl has a different name (cp27-cp27m, not cp27-none). I
> noticed it last night, just went to bed before I fixed it :)
>
>
and this is why we
They actually build wheels now (lol), the builder having some upgrades has
meant that the whl has a different name (cp27-cp27m, not cp27-none). I
noticed it last night, just went to bed before I fixed it :)
On 8 Sep 2016 9:19 AM, "Glyph Lefkowitz" wrote:
> I think MSIs are generally a bad way to
I think MSIs are generally a bad way to distribute Python libraries. We are
still building them for some reason, and the builder has a bad recent track
record of build failures:
https://buildbot.twistedmatrix.com/builders/windows7-64-py2.7-msi
Is there any reason we shouldn't get rid of this?
