> Can we start with a limited experimental usage? Some new code can be
> written this way, and we'll see if there's any negative feedback
> following the next release.
>
> I don't want existing code to get ported to the new syntax just because
> it's possible now.
Sure, just because it's possible
On 03:24 pm, ita...@itamarst.org wrote:
>Until now we haven't AFAIK used decorator syntax, but I think it's time
>we start to. In places where we were already using decorators without
>the special syntax, that is.
>
>Consider:
>
>def foo(cls, arg):
># lalalal
>foo = classmethod(fo
Until now we haven't AFAIK used decorator syntax, but I think it's time
we start to. In places where we were already using decorators without
the special syntax, that is.
Consider:
def foo(cls, arg):
# lalalal
foo = classmethod(foo)
One has to type "foo" three times (a potential
