On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:29 AM, Tobias Oberstein <
tobias.oberst...@tavendo.de> wrote:
> I know this is kinda OT for this list, but it could serve Twisted
> indirectly: by propagating
> it's mature, sane Deferred concept/terminology instead of half-baked,
> flawned others.
>
In some ways the po
I have collected the Deferreds from
Nevow
MochiKit
Closure
jQuery
(and Twisted)
here
https://github.com/oberstet/jdeferred/tree/master/others
for convenient comparison.
I'd be interested in baking a JS Deferred which
- replicates the Twisted Deferred in semantics and syntax (API) as closely a
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Tobias Oberstein
wrote:
>>> Note that as far as I know, MochiKit isn't actively developed anymore.
>>> Google's Closure has a fork of MochiKit's Deferred's, which seems to
>>> incorporate some of Dojo's code as well.
>>>
>>>
>>> http://code.google.com/p/closure-li
>> Note that as far as I know, MochiKit isn't actively developed anymore.
>> Google's Closure has a fork of MochiKit's Deferred's, which seems to
>> incorporate some of Dojo's code as well.
>>
>>
>> http://code.google.com/p/closure-library/source/browse/trunk/third_party/clos
>> ure/goog/mochik
Hi Jasper,
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 19:48:14 -0500, Jasper St. Pierre
wrote:
> Note that as far as I know, MochiKit isn't actively developed anymore.
> Google's Closure has a fork of MochiKit's Deferred's, which seems to
> incorporate some of Dojo's code as well.
>
>
> http://code.google.com/p/
Note that as far as I know, MochiKit isn't actively developed anymore.
Google's Closure has a fork of MochiKit's Deferred's, which seems to
incorporate some of Dojo's code as well.
http://code.google.com/p/closure-library/source/browse/trunk/third_party/closure/goog/mochikit/async/
On Wed, Aug
Jasper, Allen, Richard,
thanks all for the pointers. I am confused now;)
No, seriously, I need to _test_ those libs, to see what they actually do.
I.e. I suspect the "new Dojo Deferreds" with "then" return something
different than the broken "then" in jQuery 1.5.
This is all messy, personally,
On 25 August 2011 00:30, Tobias Oberstein wrote:
> I am still wondering why they called the other stuff "then()" when it's not
> then, but "also()"
> and "pipe()" is the real ;)
I agree. I had the same frustration a few months ago and various
Twisted people pointed out missing features in Jquer
My understanding (partially aided by this post:
http://www.sitepen.com/blog/2010/05/03/robust-promises-with-dojo-deferred-1-5/)
is that Dojo provides both twisted-style "addCallback" and
CommonJS-style
"then" methods.
___
Twisted-Python mailing list
Twist
As far as I know, Dojo's Deferreds are a direct port of Twisted's.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Tobias Oberstein
wrote:
> Found something: it seems in jQuery 1.6 they have introduced something which
> corresponds
> more closely to Twisted Deferreds callback/errback chains:
>
> //
Found something: it seems in jQuery 1.6 they have introduced something which
corresponds
more closely to Twisted Deferreds callback/errback chains:
// prints 23
sess.call("square", 23).pipe(function(res) {
return sess.call("sqrt",
Ok. This is most unpleasant. In particular since my options then are:
1) write my own, sane (Twisted like, which I think is the sane way) JS
deferred, not use jQuery/CommonJS (which everyone else does)
2) open the door for users running into issues when they do both Twisted &
JS/jQuery and don't
No, this is something jQuery and CommonJS got wrong; callbacks don't chain
in their implementation.
Firing a jQuery promise invokes each callback in order with the same
argument. Firing a Deferred in Twisted invokes the first callback then
passes its return value as the arg to the next callback, a
I follow Glyphs advice and only keep the lambda version with standard Twisted
Deferred.
However, I've got a (I believe) more serious "design" problem.
The RPC stuff works in Twisted, but also from JavaScript.
So I have 2 audiences (Twisted and JS developers).
On JS, I use the Deferreds that co
14 matches
Mail list logo
