FWIW, the separation of generating SQL and executing SQL was my intent
in designing this: https://github.com/iffy/norm Currently, it *only*
has asynchronous SQL execution, but it wouldn't be hard to add
synchronous execution.
Also, there's no subclassing of modeled classes.
Matt Haggard
On Wed,
This reminded me of something I read years ago from Doug Schmidt on a pattern
half sync half async:
http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/PDF/PLoP-95.pdf
I feel it is relevant but the picture may be upside down in relation to writing
twisted wrappers which may want to wrap a blocking API.
On Aug 2
On Aug 21, 2013, at 11:05 AM, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
> Having a great ORM for twisted is wonderful , but its way less exciting and
> attractive if it's only for twisted.
Doing this is simple, although probably not easy: you just need to convince the
SQLAlchemy folks to separate the process o
I am currently using SQLAlchemy with Twisted with deferToThread and it works
rather well, have you tried it? So long as you create a new session for each
thread you spawn (which you should also do without Twisted) it works without
any modification required.
Here's an example of using SQLAlchemy
It would be really beneficial if this were something that fully works with
twisted, but is not dependent on it.
For example, I have a "Project" that mostly uses SqlAlchemy. It started out in
Pylons, new development is on Pyramid and there are additional tasks in Celery
+ some more in Twisted.
On Jul 25, 2013, at 1:08 AM, Hynek Schlawack wrote:
> Am 25.07.2013 um 00:43 schrieb Glyph :
>
>> If you just want to see broader testing first, a better solution would be
>> for Hynek to just contribute to the Calendar Server project directly so that
>> there are effectively 2 parties involve
On 24 Jul, 10:43 pm, gl...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
If you just want to see broader testing first, a better solution would
be for Hynek to just contribute to the Calendar Server project directly
so that there are effectively 2 parties involved rather than 3; for
starters, we could have a set
Am 25.07.2013 um 00:43 schrieb Glyph :
> If you just want to see broader testing first, a better solution would be for
> Hynek to just contribute to the Calendar Server project directly so that
> there are effectively 2 parties involved rather than 3; for starters, we
> could have a setup.py i
On Jul 24, 2013, at 11:05 AM, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
> On 05:43 pm, gl...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
>> On Jul 23, 2013, at 12:12 AM, Hynek Schlawack wrote:
>>> What exactly do you mean? Sounds like you’d like it to got straight into
>>> Twisted? Wouldn’t it make more sense to release i
Am 24.07.2013 um 20:05 schrieb exar...@twistedmatrix.com:
> It seems like this would get the ball rolling more quickly and I don't see
> the downside. If anything, having it as an independent project is more
> likely to get more people interested in it more quickly and so increase the
> pool
On 05:43 pm, gl...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
On Jul 23, 2013, at 12:12 AM, Hynek Schlawack wrote:
What exactly do you mean? Sounds like you’d like it to got straight
into Twisted? Wouldn’t it make more sense to release it separately
first? You know, kind of http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2013
On Jul 23, 2013, at 12:12 AM, Hynek Schlawack wrote:
> Am 22.07.2013 um 23:37 schrieb Glyph :
>
>>> How would you feel about packaging it up on PyPI so people can try it out
>>> effortlessly? What do Apple’s licenses say about that? Yes, I’m
>>> volunteering.
>>>
>>> It seems it's released
Am 22.07.2013 um 23:37 schrieb Glyph :
>> How would you feel about packaging it up on PyPI so people can try it out
>> effortlessly? What do Apple’s licenses say about that? Yes, I’m volunteering.
>>
>> It seems it's released under the ASL2. I don't know if Apple prevents *its*
>> employees fr
On Jul 19, 2013, at 1:21 AM, Laurens Van Houtven <_...@lvh.io> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Hynek Schlawack wrote:
> How would you feel about packaging it up on PyPI so people can try it out
> effortlessly? What do Apple’s licenses say about that? Yes, I’m volunteering.
>
> It se
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Hynek Schlawack wrote:
>
> How would you feel about packaging it up on PyPI so people can try it out
> effortlessly? What do Apple’s licenses say about that? Yes, I’m
> volunteering.
>
It seems it's released under the ASL2. I don't know if Apple prevents *its*
emp
Hi,
>> I know that this has been asked before, but it's been a while and I'm
>> hoping for some good news. Is there a SQL ORM that works well with
>> Twisted and PostgreSQL? In particular I'm hoping to find something
>> that works with txpostgres as that's the library I prefer to access
>> the d
> On Jul 17, 2013, at 5:04 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>
> > I know that this has been asked before, but it's been a while and I'm
> > hoping for some good news. Is there a SQL ORM that works well with
> > Twisted and PostgreSQL? In particular I'm hoping to find something
> > that works with txpos
On Jul 17, 2013, at 5:04 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> I know that this has been asked before, but it's been a while and I'm
> hoping for some good news. Is there a SQL ORM that works well with
> Twisted and PostgreSQL? In particular I'm hoping to find something
> that works with txpostgres as th
I know that this has been asked before, but it's been a while and I'm
hoping for some good news. Is there a SQL ORM that works well with
Twisted and PostgreSQL? In particular I'm hoping to find something
that works with txpostgres as that's the library I prefer to access
the database with.
--
Je
19 matches
Mail list logo
