On 2010-06-17, James Y Knight wrote:
> On Jun 17, 2010, at 3:16 PM, Zooko O'Whielacronx wrote:
> > Some
> > people think there aren't enough routers that implement UPnP well
> > enough to make it worthwhile
>
> Doesn't *every* home router purchased in the last 5 years support one
> of UPnP or NA
On Jun 17, 2010, at 3:16 PM, Zooko O'Whielacronx wrote:
> Some
> people think there aren't enough routers that implement UPnP well
> enough to make it worthwhile
Doesn't *every* home router purchased in the last 5 years support one
of UPnP or NAT-PMP? That's been my experience, at least.
James
Coincidentally there's been some talk about this over on
tahoe-...@tahoe-lafs.org:
http://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/2010-June/004469.html
Tahoe-LAFS is a distributed storage system which uses Twisted. Some
people think there aren't enough routers that implement UPnP well
enough to make i
lasizoillo wrote:
> I don't know if this is Deluge's method, but sounds interesting:
> http://samy.pl/natpin/?port=80
>
Hm. That's another kind of hack, and it didn't work for me.
> If you don't want see deluge code, maybe you want use a sniffer.
> Wireshark is great for these things ;-)
> http:
