On 04:23 am, gl...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
>On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Facundo Batista
>wrote:
>>On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 3:13 PM, wrote:
>>
>> > The idea here is cool, and I think it would be nice to support it,
>>but
>> > this code is pretty gross and, as far as I know, broken. I think
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Facundo Batista
wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 3:13 PM, wrote:
>
> > The idea here is cool, and I think it would be nice to support it, but
> > this code is pretty gross and, as far as I know, broken. I think we
> > should think about getting rid of it. If we
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 3:13 PM, wrote:
> The idea here is cool, and I think it would be nice to support it, but
> this code is pretty gross and, as far as I know, broken. I think we
> should think about getting rid of it. If we go that route, then you
> should be able to ignore it for your Py
On 25 Mar, 10:26 pm, facundobati...@gmail.com wrote:
>Hello!
>
>Creating a test case for a change in twisted/manhole/explorer.py, I
>found these lines in CRUFT_WatchyThingie.watchObject:
>
>if type(object) is not types.InstanceType:
>raise TypeError, "Sorry, can only place a wat
Hello!
Creating a test case for a change in twisted/manhole/explorer.py, I
found these lines in CRUFT_WatchyThingie.watchObject:
if type(object) is not types.InstanceType:
raise TypeError, "Sorry, can only place a watch on Instances."
Always talking in Python 2, if you pass a
