Re: [Twisted-Python] Notice of future removal of Python 3.3 and 3.4 support in Twisted

2017-06-15 Thread Glyph
> On Jun 15, 2017, at 9:09 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 3:33 AM, Amber Hawkie Brown > mailto:hawk...@atleastfornow.net>> wrote: > > > Our policy says "buildbot builder" explicitly as the basis for support. Plus, > Travis is some Pythons yolo'd onto a random Ubuntu f

Re: [Twisted-Python] Notice of future removal of Python 3.3 and 3.4 support in Twisted

2017-06-15 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 3:33 AM, Amber Hawkie Brown < hawk...@atleastfornow.net> wrote: > > > Our policy says "buildbot builder" explicitly as the basis for support. > Plus, Travis is some Pythons yolo'd onto a random Ubuntu for the purposes > of smoke testing for people without access to our full

Re: [Twisted-Python] Notice of future removal of Python 3.3 and 3.4 support in Twisted

2017-06-15 Thread Amber Hawkie Brown
> On 11 Jun 2017, at 17:05, Glyph wrote: > >> On Jun 10, 2017, at 7:55 PM, Amber Hawkie Brown > > wrote: >> >> We currently have no 3.3 or 3.4 builders except on Travis, so these Python >> versions aren't really "fully supported" per our policy > > Why don't

Re: [Twisted-Python] Notice of future removal of Python 3.3 and 3.4 support in Twisted

2017-06-11 Thread Glyph
> On Jun 10, 2017, at 7:55 PM, Amber Hawkie Brown > wrote: > > We currently have no 3.3 or 3.4 builders except on Travis, so these Python > versions aren't really "fully supported" per our policy Why don't travis builders imply full support? My understanding was that CI == supported. (This

[Twisted-Python] Notice of future removal of Python 3.3 and 3.4 support in Twisted

2017-06-10 Thread Amber Hawkie Brown
As per our Compatibility Policy (https://twistedmatrix.com/documents/current/core/development/policy/compatibility-policy.html#supporting-and-de-supporting-python-versions