On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Alec Matusis wrote:
> The biggest advantage of Twisted is a shorter development time, and the
> availability of Python libraries. But I wonder if running something of the
> scale of Facebook chat would be feasible at all, or if there are people on
> this list tha
> The biggest advantage of Twisted is a shorter development time, and the
> availability of Python libraries. But I wonder if running something of the
> scale of Facebook chat would be feasible at all, or if there are people on
> this list that have run many parallelized twisted servers that satur
>It became very painful once
>we started getting CPU bound on 32 core CPU machines. We had to run
multiple instances of our Twisted server implementation
>to saturate the machine. I have since "ported" the same application to
Erlang/OTP. It is about 1/5 the amount of code.
>And it scales 1:1 horiz
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Laurens Van Houtven wrote:
> One is a language. The other is an event loop. I'm not sure how we are
> supposed to compare the two. If he would've said E and Twisted,
> perhaps it'd be a more interesting comparison :-)
>
> Also, what Steve said jumped right into my
neers seems to say that debugging of E
is transparent, but I do not have the first hand knowledge.
> -Original Message-
> From: twisted-python-boun...@twistedmatrix.com [mailto:twisted-python-
> boun...@twistedmatrix.com] On Behalf Of Jamu Kakar
> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2
-
> From: twisted-python-boun...@twistedmatrix.com [mailto:twisted-python-
> boun...@twistedmatrix.com] On Behalf Of Laurens Van Houtven
> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 12:28 PM
> To: Twisted general discussion
> Subject: Re: [Twisted-Python] I found an interisting comment about
>
Hi Alec,
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Alec Matusis wrote:
> As you can see from the %CPU column, I have my reasons for concern ;) This
> is current copy and paste from a node with 2x quad core xeon L5420 @
> 2.50GHz - 1 twistd process per core.
>
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %C
cussion
> Subject: Re: [Twisted-Python] I found an interisting comment about
> Twisted vs. Erlang
>
> I think we are accounting way too much time to the unfounded
> unaccountable random blathering of a troll :-)
>
> ___
> Twisted-Python ma
I think we are accounting way too much time to the unfounded
unaccountable random blathering of a troll :-)
___
Twisted-Python mailing list
Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com
http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Alec Matusis wrote:
> I have been a long time Twisted user, and I do not know Erlang.
> I run into this interesting comment in engineering notes on Facebook Chat
> scalability:
>
> http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=51412338919&comments
>
> “Leif K-Brooks
>
One is a language. The other is an event loop. I'm not sure how we are
supposed to compare the two. If he would've said E and Twisted,
perhaps it'd be a more interesting comparison :-)
Also, what Steve said jumped right into my eye as well. Don't get me
wrong. I like Erlang -- it's functional, it'
On Sep 29, 2009, at 2:16 PM, Alec Matusis wrote:
> I have been a long time Twisted user, and I do not know Erlang.
> I run into this interesting comment in engineering notes on Facebook
> Chat
> scalability:
>
> http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=51412338919&comments
>
> “Leif K-Brooks
>
I have been a long time Twisted user, and I do not know Erlang.
I run into this interesting comment in engineering notes on Facebook Chat
scalability:
http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=51412338919&comments
Leif K-Brooks
I'm curious whether you considered using the Python library Twisted
(
13 matches
Mail list logo