Hi,
|--==> On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:39:01 +0100, Free Ekanayaka
said:
EF> What should we do next? Can the currently packages in Debian be revoked
or do
EF> we have to prepare new ones?
FE> I've just prepared a new revision (10.0.0-2) with the two fixes you
FE> reported and gonna upload
Hi Esteve,
|--==> On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 13:03:31 +0100 (CET), "Esteve Fernandez"
said:
EF> Thanks! However, there are some glitches in the packages you uploaded to
Debian:
EF> - they skipped 9.0.0-2, and thus #566395 and #566913 are open again
EF> - python-twisted doesn't depend on >= 10.0
Hi Free
> Nice job. I can sponsor the upload to Debian, if that helps (I guess
> once all packages are in Debian we can request a sync, and it probably
> makes sense as anyway we want to eventually have them in Debian as
> well).
Thanks! However, there are some glitches in the packages you upload
Hi Esteve,
|--==> On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 22:37:12 +0100 (CET), "Esteve Fernandez"
said:
EF> Hi
>>Matthias said he thinks that a Feature Freeze Exception is fine for
>>Twisted 10.0.0, and I can go on packaging it. There are quite a few
>>source packages to update, I'll try to do it in the co
Hi
> Matthias said he thinks that a Feature Freeze Exception is fine for
> Twisted 10.0.0, and I can go on packaging it. There are quite a few
> source packages to update, I'll try to do it in the coming days.
I uploaded updated version of all the packages to our PPA [1] and requested a
sponsored
Hi,
|--==> On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 14:54:23 -, exar...@twistedmatrix.com said:
>>Good question. Something like pulling the source packages of all
>>packages directly or indirectly depending on python-twisted-core and
>>grepping for connectUDP.
> I looked at the direct (apt-cache rdepends
On 02:20 pm, f...@64studio.com wrote:
|--==> On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 13:10:46 +, Jonathan Lange
said:
>>If we want to update all twisted Ubuntu packages and not only the
-core
>>one, I *think* we need a separate bug filed against each of them. A
>>quick answer on #ubuntu-devel should clear
|--==> On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 13:10:46 +, Jonathan Lange said:
>>If we want to update all twisted Ubuntu packages and not only the -core
>>one, I *think* we need a separate bug filed against each of them. A
>>quick answer on #ubuntu-devel should clear this out.
>>
> They have separate
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> |--==> On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 18:38:36 +, Jonathan Lange
> said:
>
> JL> Since we've just released Twisted 10.0.0 and since the release is
> JL> awesome, stable, low-risk and a great thing to have in the next
> JL> long-
Hi Jonathan,
|--==> On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 18:38:36 +, Jonathan Lange said:
JL> Since we've just released Twisted 10.0.0 and since the release is
JL> awesome, stable, low-risk and a great thing to have in the next
JL> long-term support version of Ubuntu, I think we should strive to get a
Hello all,
Ubuntu's "Lucid Lynx" is now in feature freeze, meaning that it won't
automatically take new versions of packages (see
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FeatureFreeze).
Since we've just released Twisted 10.0.0 and since the release is
awesome, stable, low-risk and a great thing to have in the ne
11 matches
Mail list logo
