Re: [Twisted-Python] PB vs JMS

2009-10-07 Thread Jacopo Pecci
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Drew Smathers wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 9:14 AM, wrote: >> >> I looked at PB for an architecture with one client distributing some >> processing to several servers. Now I came across JMS and I have seen that >> using ActiveMQ with the Stomp protocol there

[Twisted-Python] PB vs JMS

2009-10-05 Thread jacopo . pecci
I looked at PB for an architecture with one client distributing some processing to several servers. Now I came across JMS and I have seen that using ActiveMQ with the Stomp protocol there would be a good support for Python. Surprising I couldn't find any article comparing the two technologies

[Twisted-Python] reactor blocked

2009-09-28 Thread Jacopo Pecci
How could I get the first result as soon as ready and therefore parallelize things? I don’t want to block the reactor with further processing if It has some results ready to be redurned. thanks, Jacopo SERVER: fibo=Fibonacci() fact=pb.PBServerFactory(fibo) reactor.listenTCP(port, fact) reactor.r