On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:15 PM, Роман Мещеряков
wrote:
> Hi everyone! I’m new to Twisted and mailing lists, so please excuse me if I
> make some mistake. My question maybe trivial, but as far as I know it is
> neither explained on the twistedmatrix.com web site nor easily resolved
> using Google
http://twistedmatrix.com/pipermail/twisted-python/2016-October/030819.html
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I filed this bug:
> https://twistedmatrix.com/trac/ticket/8931
>
> At least for me, conch fails to parse a host key created by OpenSSH
> in ~/.ssh/known_host
Oh and it seems tab completion was being worked on but that's been
left waiting for a while now -
https://twistedmatrix.com/trac/ticket/6863
Still fantastically useful without though, so no complaints there.
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> A reply from Amber herself
f -- we should update these examples to add this, so
> that they run out of the box again.
>
> - Amber
>
> On 10 Oct. 2016, at 13:05, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
>
> My google-fu is failing me (or I'm the only one with a misconfigured
> ssh system), but none of the examples on
>
My google-fu is failing me (or I'm the only one with a misconfigured
ssh system), but none of the examples on
http://twistedmatrix.com/documents/current/conch/examples/index.html
run for me.
The ConchError I'm mostly getting says ('no host keys, failing',
None), while the simplesshserver.py exampl
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Manish Tomar wrote:
> I was on synchronous mindset before learning Twisted and did not
> like/understand Deferred. The `yield` based statement really helped me
> initially but more importantly over time I liked seeing an explicit
> difference between blocking vs non
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 12:42 PM, meejah wrote:
> Oon-Ee Ng writes:
>
>> The closest I'm able to come to that so far is for my function to be
>> decorated with @defer.inlineCallbacks which will then look like this
>>
>> val = yield doSomeCallRemoteCallHe
First off, I've read [1] and am not trying to convert twisted code
into blocking code (well, I WAS, but have reconsidered).
I've got Kivy code using twisted code without much problem, but really
hated defining many in-line functions/lambdas for simple 'assign the
result to a Kivy widget' style thi
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz
wrote:
>
> On Nov 25, 2015, at 04:54, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
>
> And furthermore that when I do that, callRemote no longer returns a
> deferred (which makes sense, really) an
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> And furthermore that when I do that, callRemote no longer returns a
> deferred (which makes sense, really) and instead gets a None. One more
> check before I add my default errBacks then. Optimised network traffic
> sounds posi
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, right now I just have plenty of return {} everywhere. Does
>> requiresAnswer=False mean less bandwidth usage (no need to transmit an
>> empty
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
>
> Thanks, right now I just have plenty of return {} everywhere. Does
> requiresAnswer=False mean less bandwidth usage (no need to transmit an
> empty dict)?
Having read the documentation a bit, it appears requiresAnswer=False
is a
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Glyph Lefkowitz
wrote:
> I'm sorry that this was an unpleasant surprise. I wish that we had a better
> way of getting this across up-front :-). However, it seems like the length
> limit is doing its job in terms of constraining your protocol design to not
> have
I've just (to my surprise) hit this. As I understand from searching
around, AMP messages are limited to ~64k due to the length prefix
being 16-bit. A change in my internal data being sent (using dicts
rather than lists) kicked one of my messages to way over that limit.
There's a bit of discussion
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz
wrote:
>> On Nov 19, 2015, at 9:19 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Nov 15, 2015, at 9:54 AM, Itamar Turner-Trauring
>>>>
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz
wrote:
>
>> On Nov 15, 2015, at 9:54 AM, Itamar Turner-Trauring
>> wrote:
>>
>> On 11/15/2015 10:19 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
>>> Based on my reading/searching, multiple reactors in the same process
>>> (
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 1:56 AM, Itamar Turner-Trauring
wrote:
> On 11/13/2015 07:45 PM, Tristan Seligmann wrote:
>>
>>
>> 1) The Twisted project has already experimentally demonstrated the
>> imprudence of an approach that massively breaks backwards compatibility with
>> old APIs (even if it does
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 1:54 AM, Itamar Turner-Trauring
wrote:
> On 11/15/2015 10:19 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
>>
>> I'm also unable to find any information about connecting to self (for
>> example, to send messages from one reactor to itself).
>>
>>
>
> You
Based on my reading/searching, multiple reactors in the same process
(even in multiple threads) is pretty much a no-go because
twisted.internet.reactor is a global singleton.
I'm also unable to find any information about connecting to self (for
example, to send messages from one reactor to itself)
And lo and behold it seems to work now even with Kivy. Strange. For
posterity, here's the simple client code I was using for a minimal
example. I'll expand upwards from here and see how far I can get.
#install_twisted_rector must be called before importing the reactor
from kivy.support import inst
9, simpleSum)
deferLater(reactor, 12, simpleSum)
deferLater(reactor, 15, simpleSum)
deferLater(reactor, 18, simpleSum).addCallback(lambda _: reactor.stop())
reactor.run()
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> Thanks David, but when I do something along the lines o
the most basic thing, modifying
the doMath() example, and mycall only triggers when the reactor stops
(even if I run doMath multiple times with delays).
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 1:15 PM, David Ripton wrote:
> On 10/28/2015 02:24 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
>> Working off the example ampserver.py a
but it doesn't seem to be doing the
sort of bidirectional messaging AMP should be doing.
In summary:- how do I see the response from client side without making
a new connection every time I have something to send (as done in the
ampclient.py example)?
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Oon
Working off the example ampserver.py and ampclient.py examples, I
wanted to build a client which maintains a single connection while
allowing the passing of messages back and forth. However I'm stuck at
one of the most basic steps, getting back the result (without
'completing' the connection).
The
24 matches
Mail list logo
