On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it was
>
> line = '%s - - %s "%s" %d %s "%s" "%s"\n' % (
>
> in 13.2.0 (twisted/web/http.py line 1920), and it's
>
> u'"%(ip)s&
Hi,
it was
line = '%s - - %s "%s" %d %s "%s" "%s"\n' % (
in 13.2.0 (twisted/web/http.py line 1920), and it's
u'"%(ip)s" - - %(timestamp)s "%(method)s %(uri)s %(protocol)s" '
so basically the client IP now gets wrapped within double quotes, e.g. a
log line that was looking l
|--==> On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 23:16:12 -, exar...@twistedmatrix.com said:
> I think this is thinking in the right direction. Twisted generally
> tries to be responsible for testing its own code, and the
> serialization from commands to bytes (and the reverse) that AMP does
> is part of T
Hi,
following up from ticket #6502, I'm looking for recommendations/best
practices for writing unit-tests for AMP-based code.
As described in the ticket, the issue I'm currently facing is that the
AMP implementation is subtly not re-entrant safe and doesn't work with a
synchronous transport, for
|--==> On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:50:10 +, Jonathan Lange said:
JL> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
>>Hi Jonathan,
>>
>>|--==> On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 22:12:34 +, Jonathan Lange
said:
>>
>> [...]
>> >>Woul
Hi Jonathan,
|--==> On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 22:12:34 +, Jonathan Lange said:
[...]
>>Would you elaborate on that and explain why you come to prefer it over
>>trial for your new projects?
JL> That's mostly documented here:
JL> http://testtools.readthedocs.org/en/latest/overview.html
Hi Glyph,
|--==> On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 16:20:37 -0500, Glyph said:
[...]
>>Right. At the time it was discouraging because I felt like there were
>>a hundred tests to fix one at a time, then add the deprecation warning
>>and then a year later get to my actual goal of removing the extra
>>i
Hi Jonathan,
|--==> On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 22:15:18 +, Jonathan Lange said:
[...]
>>Even those returning deferreds and using AsynchronousDeferredRunTest? I
>>presume so, just asking to be sure.
>>
JL> Yes.
JL> (Also, you don't get sure from asking, you get sure from trying).
True,
Hi Glyph,
|--==> On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 12:30:14 -0500, Glyph said:
G> On Feb 8, 2012, at 12:22 PM, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
>>Probably a good addition to the documentation of the two projects
>>would be to describe the differences between the two and if there is
>>a
Hi Jonathan,
|--==> On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 08:32:27 +, Jonathan Lange said:
[...]
JL> I know it's bad form, but I endorse everything that Glyph said. Except
JL> that I'd add that testtools is awesome and you should use that.
Would you elaborate on that and explain why you come to prefer
Hi Glyph,
|--==> On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 02:05:22 -0500, Glyph said:
[...]
G> The position that Twisted can take is that Trial is awesome and you
G> should use Trial. testtools is a separate project, and you may
G> elect to use it to enhance your trial experience.
That sounds good to me.
Hi Jonathan,
|--==> On Mon, 6 Feb 2012 19:01:30 +, Jonathan Lange said:
[...]
JL> As much as I would like to see that happen, I am not ever going to do
JL> anything about it.
So what position can the Twisted project realistically take? Keep using
trial for testing Twisted itself, but
Hi Ilja,
|--==> On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 13:02:43 +0200, Jamu Kakar said:
JK> Hi Ilja,
JK> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Ilja Livenson
wrote:
>>basically, $subj. I really like the DeferredStore concept introduced
>>in storm/twisted-integration, but it seems that that branch is lagging
Hey,
|--==> On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:07:56 +0100, Jonathan Lange said:
JL> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>is there a way to tell trial run groups of tests in parallel in
>>different processes? Something like the &
Hi,
is there a way to tell trial run groups of tests in parallel in
different processes? Something like the "-jN" option in zope-testrunner.
Or alternatively, what's the recommended way to make better use of
multi-core CPUs when running a test suite with trial?
Thanks,
Free
___
Hi,
|--==> On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:39:01 +0100, Free Ekanayaka
said:
EF> What should we do next? Can the currently packages in Debian be revoked
or do
EF> we have to prepare new ones?
FE> I've just prepared a new revision (10.0.0-2) with the two fixes you
FE> repor
Hi Esteve,
|--==> On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 13:03:31 +0100 (CET), "Esteve Fernandez"
said:
EF> Thanks! However, there are some glitches in the packages you uploaded to
Debian:
EF> - they skipped 9.0.0-2, and thus #566395 and #566913 are open again
EF> - python-twisted doesn't depend on >= 10.0
Hi Esteve,
|--==> On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 22:37:12 +0100 (CET), "Esteve Fernandez"
said:
EF> Hi
>>Matthias said he thinks that a Feature Freeze Exception is fine for
>>Twisted 10.0.0, and I can go on packaging it. There are quite a few
>>source packages to update, I'll try to do it in the co
Hi,
|--==> On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 14:54:23 -, exar...@twistedmatrix.com said:
>>Good question. Something like pulling the source packages of all
>>packages directly or indirectly depending on python-twisted-core and
>>grepping for connectUDP.
> I looked at the direct (apt-cache rdepends
|--==> On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 13:10:46 +, Jonathan Lange said:
>>If we want to update all twisted Ubuntu packages and not only the -core
>>one, I *think* we need a separate bug filed against each of them. A
>>quick answer on #ubuntu-devel should clear this out.
>>
> They have separate
Hi Jonathan,
|--==> On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 18:38:36 +, Jonathan Lange said:
JL> Since we've just released Twisted 10.0.0 and since the release is
JL> awesome, stable, low-risk and a great thing to have in the next
JL> long-term support version of Ubuntu, I think we should strive to get a
Hi,
|--==> On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:48:39 +0100, Ramiro Alba Queipo
said:
RAQ> Hi everybody,
RAQ> I recently new about Twisted and saw it as the best way to deal with a
RAQ> client/server network application (I use python long time ago). Really
RAQ> wonderful. I now intend to write a GTK
22 matches
Mail list logo
