I dont know if twisted can really be counted as a scheduler. Its purpose is
more to do with nonblocking IO. To improve IO performance in stackless you
would need to add multiplexing to its scheduler(if it doesnt already have
it). http://eventlet.net/ seems to to this.
Dan
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 9
45 AM, Phil Mayers wrote:
> On 05/09/2010 07:07 AM, Daniel Griffin wrote:
> > If you let SQLAlchemy block twisted would there be any impact besides
> > performance?
>
> Depends how long it blocks for, and what else your process is doing.
>
> With the reactor blocked:
>
If you let SQLAlchemy block twisted would there be any impact besides
performance?
Dan
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 1:35 PM, wrote:
> On 03:37 pm,
> drwxrwxr.x+twistedm...@gmail.comwrote:
> >>(yield resultset[10:20]).sort(Sort.ASC)
> >>
> >>assuming a new enough version of Python.
> >
> >I wonder if
lyph Lefkowitz
wrote:
>
> On Jan 17, 2010, at 10:45 PM, Daniel Griffin wrote:
>
> > Here are two tiny apps. They run perfectly on OSX and error like this on
> windows:
> >
> > Log conenction [Failure instance: Traceback (failure with no frames):
> > wisted.int
case they are easier to
> deal with.
>
> I will create a chunk of sample code and send it to the list.
>
> Thanks,
> Dan
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 17, 2010, at 6:25 PM, Daniel Griffin wrote:
>
Thank you for the response. I am using twisted 9.0 and tried 8.2. The python
version is 2.6. When I print the reason sent to connection lost I get
"[Failure instance: Traceback (failure with no frames): wrote:
>
> On Jan 17, 2010, at 6:25 PM, Daniel Griffin wrote:
>
> > I a
Hi,
I am using twisted in a cross-platform manner. I have written both the
client and server. The client is twisted and the server uses python threads.
I am using the select reactor and plain old TCP connections. I encode my
messages to JSON to send them.
On Windows I get tons of un-clean connect
Sure, I am not really finished with it yet. When I do get done I will do a
write up.
Dan
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Glyph Lefkowitz
wrote:
> On Oct 24, 2009, at 3:47 PM, Daniel Griffin wrote:
>
> > I ported my thread based socket code to twisted and have been happy
> &g
Hi everyone,
I ported my thread based socket code to twisted and have been happy with my
results. To re-hash, my code creates a connection then waits for the other
end to do something and respond, each connection takes a different amount of
time. I went from 3-5 connections completed per second to
Sounds good, I am going to try to get this up and running over the next few
days. I'll get back with some results.
Dan
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Steve Steiner (listsin) <
list...@integrateddevcorp.com> wrote:
>
> On Oct 14, 2009, at 4:55 AM, Laurens Van Houtven wrote:
> > Personally I'm
Hi,
I am new to twisted and have been having trouble finding out information
about twisted's performance. I have a fairly simple setup where I need to
open a bunch of TCP connections that last for varying amounts of time but
dont do much. I have tried using threads(got GILed to death) and
Processe
11 matches
Mail list logo
