On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 20:48, Glyph wrote:
> On Nov 1, 2011, at 12:14 PM, Phil Mayers wrote:
>> I find the "pass reactor as 1st argument to everything" API pattern
>> messy. I'm sure there's a good reason. What is it?
>
> This pattern is a solution to the problem, but I agree that it is possibly
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz
wrote:
> On Jun 22, 2011, at 10:04 AM, Anton Gyllenberg wrote:
>> The Ldaptor license is LGPL and I think it has always been LGPL. I'm
>> not sure, as it was well before my time, but I believe early Ldaptor
>> code w
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 8:55 PM, L. Daniel Burr wrote:
> As an aside, I recall that ldaptor never could become part of twisted, due
> to its licensing. I didn't see any license information in the new repo; I
> assume the code is still GPL v2?
The Ldaptor license is LGPL and I think it has always
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:01 PM, wrote:
> We'd be happy to have such a feature officially supported. Would you
> like to work on a patch that adds a tested, documented hook for
> selecting the source port?
Perhaps I could work on such a patch. I would be thankful for any tips
on where to start
I have external requirements that force me to issue DNS queries from a
specific local port range. I'm looking for a way to use the
twisted.names resolver but I need to specify a local port for a query
or set the local port range for all queries. I appreciate that the
local port randomization is the
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Brent McConnell wrote:
> I'm working on a web application that uses Cyclone (Twisted port or Tornado)
> and wanted
> to know if anyone had any recommendations for integration with LDAP. I need
> to do basic
> authentication as well as add and modify users and gr
The deferred returned by the LDAP client send_multiResponse() method was
previously unused in all code covered by tests, and so the replacement
method in the test driver just returned None. The deferred is now used
in search() and this change makes the test driver also return a deferred
instead of
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Anton Gyllenberg wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Itamar Turner-Trauring
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 14:52 +0300, Anton Gyllenberg wrote:
>>
>>> Any comments and suggestions welcome!
>>
>> Unit tests are always
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Itamar Turner-Trauring
wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 14:52 +0300, Anton Gyllenberg wrote:
>
>> Any comments and suggestions welcome!
>
> Unit tests are always a good idea :)
That is so true. And if not writing new ones, then at least running
exi
> I do the primary work on the ldaptor Debian package these days. Tommy did not
> release a new version for years but has the mentioned git repository. The
> Debian svn repository at
> svn://svn.debian.org/python-modules/packages/ldaptor/trunk/ contains a series
> of patches in the debian/patches d
The LDAPEntryWithClient.search() method used to send the LDAP request with
a call like
self.client.send_multiResponse(... )
send_multiResponse() returns a deferred that was just discarded. If the
operation causes an error then the errback fired on the discarded deferred
will remain unhandle
I want to use the Ldaptor LDAP client for a project. Does anybody know
whether and how Ldaptor is currently maintained and what the best
upstream source is? I need to make some changes and wonder what to
base the work on and where to discuss and publish changes.
Is it OK to discuss Ldaptor on this
12 matches
Mail list logo
