Re: [Twisted-Python] unified filesystem API

2020-05-15 Thread Chris Withers
On 16/05/2020 07:42, Glyph wrote: On May 15, 2020, at 11:30 PM, Chris Withers > wrote: On 16/05/2020 06:55, Glyph wrote: This does point out one of my secret hopes for SMB: that a file server's maintainers will care enough about file throughput that we'll finally g

Re: [Twisted-Python] unified filesystem API

2020-05-15 Thread Glyph
> On May 15, 2020, at 11:30 PM, Chris Withers wrote: > > On 16/05/2020 06:55, Glyph wrote: >> This does point out one of my secret hopes for SMB: that a file server's >> maintainers will care enough about file throughput that we'll finally get a >> centralized, official way of doing async fil

Re: [Twisted-Python] unified filesystem API

2020-05-15 Thread Chris Withers
On 16/05/2020 06:55, Glyph wrote: This does point out one of my secret hopes for SMB: that a file server's maintainers will care enough about file throughput that we'll finally get a centralized, official way of doing async file I/O that we can share with SFTP, FTP, and HTTP :). I got excite

Re: [Twisted-Python] [RFC] Drop support for Python 3.5 sometime after May 2021?

2020-05-15 Thread Glyph
> On May 15, 2020, at 8:40 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > > Maybe it would be OK to do one more release of Twisted and announce that as > the last release supporting Python 3.5, before > dropping support? Yeah; whenever we drop a Python version we should always support at least one more rele

Re: [Twisted-Python] unified filesystem API (was: SMB server component for twisted)

2020-05-15 Thread Glyph
> On May 15, 2020, at 6:14 PM, Ian Haywood wrote: > > On 16/05/2020 10:55 am, Ian Haywood wrote: >> >> On 15/05/2020 10:52 am, Glyph wrote: >>> y 14, 2020, at 5:23 PM, Wilfredo Sánchez Vega >> I think it's great to get an SMB implementation in the Twis

Re: [Twisted-Python] [RFC] Drop support for Python 3.5 sometime after May 2021?

2020-05-15 Thread Craig Rodrigues
Personally, I don't have any dependencies on Python 3.5. I just suggested once year's notice to give people time to adjust, but if no one really cares, dropping 3.5 support some time this year is fine by me. Maybe it would be OK to do one more release of Twisted and announce that as the last relea

Re: [Twisted-Python] [RFC] Drop support for Python 3.5 sometime after May 2021?

2020-05-15 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 10:05 PM Amber Brown (hawkowl) < hawk...@atleastfornow.net> wrote: > > So, I guess if we have 3.8 support, the next release can announce the > dropping of 3.5, and then the release after that can be the final one > with support. > In trunk, on Python 3.8, all the tests in

[Twisted-Python] unified filesystem API (was: SMB server component for twisted)

2020-05-15 Thread Ian Haywood
On 16/05/2020 10:55 am, Ian Haywood wrote: On 15/05/2020 10:52 am, Glyph wrote: y 14, 2020, at 5:23 PM, Wilfredo Sánchez Vega   I think it's great to get an SMB implementation in the Twisted org, but why would we even consider adding something like this to the

Re: [Twisted-Python] SMB server component for twisted

2020-05-15 Thread Ian Haywood
On 15/05/2020 10:52 am, Glyph wrote: y 14, 2020, at 5:23 PM, Wilfredo Sánchez Vega   I think it's great to get an SMB implementation in the Twisted org, but why would we even consider adding something like this to the main Twisted project? The advantage of twi