On Mar 12, 2018, at 10:27 PM, Amber Brown wrote:
>
> The buildbots went after someone said that the RAX hosting was going away,
> and I (and a few others) didn't get the (annoyingly quiet) correction that it
> was only for new projects (which was not how the original was written). All
> the tw
The buildbots went after someone said that the RAX hosting was going away,
and I (and a few others) didn't get the (annoyingly quiet) correction that
it was only for new projects (which was not how the original was written).
All the twisted list got was the original letter from the SFC without a
"f
> On Mar 12, 2018, at 4:59 AM, Adi Roiban wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It is not clear to me what builders need to pass before we can merge
> something.
>
> I expect that all supported "platforms" need to pass, but it is not
> clear what are the currently supported platforms.
>
> We have this info in
Thank you for all for all the answers so far, particularly to Ilya and
Jean-Paul who provided some very helpful code samples.
It's interesting to realise that, by avoiding locking, we can end up
with a much more efficient implementation. I'll have to figure out how
widely we can apply this tec
Thanks for correction, Jean-Paul, you're absolutly right
пн, 12 мар. 2018 г. в 23:00, Jean-Paul Calderone :
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 3:52 PM, Ilya Skriblovsky <
> ilyaskriblov...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi, Richard,
>>
>> I've used class like this to cache the result of Expensive Calculation:
>>
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 3:52 PM, Ilya Skriblovsky wrote:
> Hi, Richard,
>
> I've used class like this to cache the result of Expensive Calculation:
>
> class DeferredCache:
> pending = None
> result = None
> failure = None
>
> def __init__(self, expensive_func):
> self.exp
Hi, Richard,
I've used class like this to cache the result of Expensive Calculation:
class DeferredCache:
pending = None
result = None
failure = None
def __init__(self, expensive_func):
self.expensive_func = expensive_func
def __call__(self):
if self.pending
Hi Richard,
On March 12, 2018 at 1:49:41 PM, Richard van der Hoff (rich...@matrix.org)
wrote:
Hi folks,
I thought I'd poll the list on the best way to approach a problem in
Twisted.
The background is that we have a number of resources which can be
requested by a REST client, and which are cal
Hi folks,
I thought I'd poll the list on the best way to approach a problem in
Twisted.
The background is that we have a number of resources which can be
requested by a REST client, and which are calculated on demand. The
calculation is moderately expensive (can take multiple seconds), so th
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 7:59 AM, Adi Roiban wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It is not clear to me what builders need to pass before we can merge
> something.
>
> I expect that all supported "platforms" need to pass, but it is not
> clear what are the currently supported platforms.
>
> We have this info in the w
Hi,
It is not clear to me what builders need to pass before we can merge something.
I expect that all supported "platforms" need to pass, but it is not
clear what are the currently supported platforms.
We have this info in the wiki but it does not help.
https://twistedmatrix.com/trac/wiki/Review
11 matches
Mail list logo
