Re: [Twisted-Python] eliminating MSI builder

> On Sep 7, 2016, at 6:49 PM, Amber Brown wrote: > > They actually build wheels now (lol), the builder having some upgrades has > meant that the whl has a different name (cp27-cp27m, not cp27-none). I > noticed it last night, just went to bed before I fixed it :) > > and this is why we

Re: [Twisted-Python] eliminating MSI builder

They actually build wheels now (lol), the builder having some upgrades has meant that the whl has a different name (cp27-cp27m, not cp27-none). I noticed it last night, just went to bed before I fixed it :) On 8 Sep 2016 9:19 AM, "Glyph Lefkowitz" wrote: > I think MSIs are generally a bad way to

[Twisted-Python] eliminating MSI builder

I think MSIs are generally a bad way to distribute Python libraries. We are still building them for some reason, and the builder has a bad recent track record of build failures: https://buildbot.twistedmatrix.com/builders/windows7-64-py2.7-msi Is there any reason we shouldn't get rid of this?

Re: [Twisted-Python] Endpoint composition syntax

> However, it’s worth highlighting that endpoints are inches away from being a really powerful composable tool for saying “tunnel this protocol over this other protocol”. I'm not sure if this is the same concern as the OP. What you've described is mixing the ideas of composing protocols and compos

Re: [Twisted-Python] Endpoint composition syntax

> On 7 Sep 2016, at 00:05, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote: > > >> On Sep 6, 2016, at 11:55 AM, Tristan Seligmann > > wrote: >> >> Currently there is no way to explicitly compose Twisted endpoints, but >> several endpoint implementations have arisen that explicitly wrap