> On Nov 16, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Paweł Miech wrote:
>
> I submitted some patches yesterday, got review from Adi and today I tried to
> respond. However I'm not able to respond because all my submissions are
> marked as spam and blocked by SpamBayes with super high probability. I wonder
> how m
> On Nov 16, 2015, at 8:03 AM, Michael Schlenker wrote:
>
> One topic: What should happen if the sender sends malformed data (e.g.
> content-length: 100 and sending 200 bytes body). I would usually want to
> know if the sender is broken instead of getting a responseComplete()
> that claims every
Hello,
I submitted some patches yesterday, got review from Adi and today I tried
to respond. However I'm not able to respond because all my submissions are
marked as spam and blocked by SpamBayes with super high probability. I
wonder how many other users experience that problem?
Can you please fi
Are you sure IOCP is able to share sockets between process? It
would be great if you can share some info about this. I only use
No, I am not sure. But this SO reply seems to suggest
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14388706/socket-options-so-reuseaddr-and-so-reuseport-how-do-they
Hi Cory,
> On Nov 13, 2015, at 6:36 AM, Cory Benfield wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> # Problem Statement
>
> Thanks for your feedback on my HTTP/2 questions. I’ve started work
> implementing a spike of a HTTP/2 protocol for twisted.web. I’m aiming to have
> something that works in at least some cases
Hi,
sounds like a good idea.
One topic: What should happen if the sender sends malformed data (e.g.
content-length: 100 and sending 200 bytes body). I would usually want to
know if the sender is broken instead of getting a responseComplete()
that claims everything is fine.
We simply subclassed t
