On Jul 10, 2014, at 5:23 PM, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
> On 10 Jul, 08:37 pm, gl...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 10, 2014, at 12:32 PM, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
>>> 2) As a separate Python package, the logistics of actually using tubes are
>>> simpler (just consider how
On 10 Jul, 08:37 pm, gl...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
On Jul 10, 2014, at 12:32 PM, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
2) As a separate Python package, the logistics of actually using tubes
are simpler (just consider how you might declare a dependency on a
branch of Twisted - keeping in mind you m
Hmm, perhaps —pre shouldn’t be allowed in config files :V
On Jul 10, 2014, at 5:19 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
>
> On Jul 10, 2014, at 1:47 PM, Christopher Armstrong
> wrote:
>
>> For what it’s worth, if you add an “a%n” to the end of a version, pip won’t
>> install it unless you specify the
On Jul 10, 2014, at 1:47 PM, Christopher Armstrong
wrote:
> For what it’s worth, if you add an “a%n” to the end of a version, pip won’t
> install it unless you specify the version exactly. e.g., “tubes” version
> “0.1a1” won’t be found if you type “pip install tubes”, only “pip install
> tub
On July 10, 2014 at 3:40:26 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz (gl...@twistedmatrix.com) wrote:
On Jul 10, 2014, at 12:32 PM, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
2) As a separate Python package, the logistics of actually using tubes are
simpler (just consider how you might declare a dependency on a branch of
On Jul 10, 2014, at 12:32 PM, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Some of you may have heard rumors of some work in progress on a replacement
> for Twisted's IConsumer/IProducer interfaces.
>
> Tubes have been largely Glyph's effort (though a lot of people have
> contributed in
Hello all,
Some of you may have heard rumors of some work in progress on a
replacement for Twisted's IConsumer/IProducer interfaces.
Tubes have been largely Glyph's effort (though a lot of people have
contributed in one way or another). And a large effort it's been.
Development is proceedin
On 9 July 2014 02:34, Werner Thie wrote:
> On 7/8/14 6:30 AM, Paul Wiseman wrote:
>>
>> This is a google compute instance, so there is there firewall on
>> there. I did at first think it could be a hidden firewall rule google
>> have.
>>
>> I think I can rule anything like that out though. I tried
