On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 2:19 PM, wrote:
> On 06:06 pm, james.voip+twis...@gmail.com wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 12:58 PM, outcast
> >wrote:
> >>
> >>I have been working on a kernel module to allow me to get the packets
> >>out
> >>of kernel land and into user space ATM. Not sure how twisted
On 06:06 pm, james.voip+twis...@gmail.com wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 12:58 PM, outcast
>wrote:
>>
>>I have been working on a kernel module to allow me to get the packets
>>out
>>of kernel land and into user space ATM. Not sure how twisted.pair does
>>that. I will go and google but the ultima
On Jan 14, 2013, at 11:39 PM, Hynek Schlawack wrote:
>
> Am 14.01.2013 um 23:58 schrieb Glyph :
>
It seems like the "shared caching reference" would solve this problem
as well?
>>>
>>> Yes, I think that's the right answer. It's certainly the right design
>>> in my case, and perhaps
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 12:58 PM, outcast wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Tristan Seligmann <
> mithra...@mithrandi.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 15 Jan 2013 7:41 PM, "outcast" wrote:
>> >
>> > Greetings,
>> >
>> > Has anyone done any work around using twisted for layer 2 traffic?
>>
>> Layer
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Tristan Seligmann wrote:
>
> On 15 Jan 2013 7:41 PM, "outcast" wrote:
> >
> > Greetings,
> >
> > Has anyone done any work around using twisted for layer 2 traffic?
>
> Layer 2 traffic would be the domain of twisted.pair; I'm not aware of
> anyone using this in a
On 15 Jan 2013 7:41 PM, "outcast" wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> Has anyone done any work around using twisted for layer 2 traffic?
Layer 2 traffic would be the domain of twisted.pair; I'm not aware of
anyone using this in a "real" project, though, and I'd wager it needs some
extra work before it'll b
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Fabian Rothfuchs <
fabian.rothfu...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Yes, I thought so, too. Indeed it happens that the reactor is started
> automatically, but after the test succeeds, it's not being stopped (only
> chance is to kill –9 it).
>
Perhaps the problem isn't w
Yes, I thought so, too. Indeed it happens that the reactor is started
automatically, but after the test succeeds, it's not being stopped (only
chance is to kill 9 it).
I'm afraid I need to use the reactor, as I'd like to make automatic
end-to-end tests within my application, going from the workflo
