Am 14.01.2013 um 23:58 schrieb Glyph :
>>> It seems like the "shared caching reference" would solve this problem
>>> as well?
>>
>> Yes, I think that's the right answer. It's certainly the right design
>> in my case, and perhaps in the general case too.
>
> I think that this is the right design
On Jan 14, 2013, at 5:10 PM, Peter Westlake wrote:
> The main question left in my mind is about the degree of dependency
> between the checker and the realm if extra information is passed,
> by whatever method. If the realm expects the checker to pass it
> (for instance) an LDAP session, then it
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013, at 22:58, Glyph wrote:
> On Jan 14, 2013, at 3:18 AM, Peter Westlake
> wrote:
>
> >> It seems like the "shared caching reference" would solve this problem
> >> as well?
> >
> > Yes, I think that's the right answer. It's certainly the right design
> > in my case, and perhaps
On Jan 14, 2013, at 3:18 AM, Peter Westlake wrote:
>> It seems like the "shared caching reference" would solve this problem
>> as well?
>
> Yes, I think that's the right answer. It's certainly the right design
> in my case, and perhaps in the general case too.
I think that this is the right des
On 14 January 2013 15:40, Laurens Van Houtven <_...@lvh.cc> wrote:
> The Foolscap website describes the principal features (as differences to
> PB):
>
> http://foolscap.lothar.com/trac/wiki/FoolscapFeatures
>
>
Thank you!
--
with regards,
Maxim
___
Twi
The Foolscap website describes the principal features (as differences to
PB):
http://foolscap.lothar.com/trac/wiki/FoolscapFeatures
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Maxim Lacrima wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Sorry for off-topic.
>
> What is the motivation behind creation of Foolscap (newpb)? What does it
>
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Peter Westlake wrote:
> Interesting... those portals could be on different Realms too. It would
> also allow more than one checker to be tried per interface, which would
> allow (say) a credentials.IUsernamePassword to be tried against different
> checkers.
>
In
Interesting... those portals could be on different Realms too. It would
also allow more than one checker to be tried per interface, which would
allow (say) a credentials.IUsernamePassword to be tried against
different checkers.
Peter.
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013, at 14:08, Itamar Turner-Trauring wrote:
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013, at 6:39, Glyph wrote:
>
> On Jan 10, 2013, at 6:41 AM, Peter Westlake
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013, at 18:02, Glyph wrote
> >> On Jan 9, 2013, at 9:26 AM, Peter Westlake
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Jan 9, Adi wrote:
> I am not an expert in Twisted, but from my understa
Hi!
Sorry for off-topic.
What is the motivation behind creation of Foolscap (newpb)? What does it
solve that can't be solved by old PB?
Thank you
On 13 January 2013 07:48, Glyph wrote:
>
> On Jan 12, 2013, at 7:29 PM, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
>
> On 03:15 am, abhishekb...@hotmail.com
10 matches
Mail list logo