On 08:05 pm, fabian.rothfu...@googlemail.com wrote:
So JP,
Having the reactor running in a first thread and *all* the rest in a
second one
is alright, if the second one calls the reactor via callFromThread() ?
Yes, that's fine. (I think Glyph got you pointed in the right
direction, I didn't
Hi,
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:05:07 -0500, Fabian Rothfuchs
wrote:
> So JP,
> Having the reactor running in a first thread and *all* the rest in a
> second one
> is alright, if the second one calls the reactor via callFromThread() ?
>
> Elsewise, I need to find out how to wrap Twisted around Djan
So JP,
Having the reactor running in a first thread and *all* the rest in a
second one
is alright, if the second one calls the reactor via callFromThread() ?
Elsewise, I need to find out how to wrap Twisted around Django… hum…
Fabian
On 9/19/11 9:53 PM, "exar...@twistedmatrix.com"
wrote:
>
On 07:02 pm, fabian.rothfu...@googlemail.com wrote:
Well no, not from multiple threads.
I have only two threads one main thread, which is the Django
framework,
and one detached
thread for the reactor, as the reactor itself would be blocking Django.
All Adapters are in Django, and are reachin
On Sep 19, 2011, at 3:40 PM, Fabian Rothfuchs wrote:
> That’s a tremendous advice!
> Indeed I was directly calling connectTCP() - I changed it to do like
>
> reactor.callFromThread(reactor.connectTCP, host, port, factory, timeout=5)
>
> Thanks!
No problem! I'm glad I caught this befo
That¹s a tremendous advice!
Indeed I was directly calling connectTCP() - I changed it to do like
reactor.callFromThread(reactor.connectTCP, host, port, factory, timeout=5)
Thanks!
Fabian
From: Glyph Lefkowitz
Reply-To: Twisted general discussion
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:21:34 -0400
To: T
On Sep 19, 2011, at 3:02 PM, Fabian Rothfuchs wrote:
> Well no, not from multiple threads.
> I have only two threads – one main thread, which is the Django framework, and
> one detached
> thread for the reactor, as the reactor itself would be blocking Django.
>
> All Adapters are in Django, an
Well no, not from multiple threads.
I have only two threads one main thread, which is the Django framework,
and one detached
thread for the reactor, as the reactor itself would be blocking Django.
All Adapters are in Django, and are reaching out to the one reactor in the
thread without threadin
On Sep 19, 2011, at 2:03 PM, Fabian Rothfuchs wrote:
> The second important part was the wakeUp() call, which apparently triggers
> the reactor
> To end all blocking tasks.
For the most part, you have got the right idea now, but this is a BIG flashing
red light for me. wakeUp() shouldn't actua
>One thing you can do is make a small initial startup method that
>you supply to reactor.callLater with a delay of 0, that does the loop on
>the connectTCP()'s. It will start up your initial set of connections.
Thanks John, this was *really* helpful!
I now did the following:
1. On Startup, the ap
On 09/19/2011 02:44 PM, Fabian Rothfuchs wrote:
Hi Guys,
[...]
So I wonder, if you can dynamically feed the reactor with new tasks (I use connectTCP for it), as
it's not possible to start/stop it on demand (or if there's an alternative approach):
Hi,
in general you do [whatever you want] in r
I'm a newbie compared to most of the people on this list, but this is a
question I think I can answer:
Your call to reactor.run() in main() won't return until the reactor shuts
down. After reactor.run(), *everything* happens in a deferred, until one
of them shuts down the reactor.
One thing you
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 7:44 AM, Fabian Rothfuchs
wrote:
>
> for host in hosts:
> host, port = (host, 23)
> d = defer.Deferred()
> from twisted.internet import reactor
> factory = S12ClientFactory(d, username='root', password='admin')
> Connection = reactor.connectTCP(host, por
Hi Guys,
I'm relatively new to Twisted (as the most questioners I guess).
Without providing tons of distracting details, this is where I'm stuck w/
Twisted:
I currently build a server application that consists of a set of client
adapters, which (among others) use Telnet as transport protocol so
14 matches
Mail list logo
