On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 12:50:33AM +0200, Laurens Van Houtven wrote:
> See people? Feedback works, now give me more of it please ;-)
Perhaps I'm looking at the wrong place; the "pep-.rst" I'm looking
at via the web interface contains only an short abstract and a rationale
that won't be controv
... and closed!
See people? Feedback works, now give me more of it please ;-)
cheers
lvh
___
Twisted-Python mailing list
Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com
http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Kevin Horn wrote:
> Hmmm...you might think about also allowing bytearrays everywhere it says
> "data must be a bytestring". Maybe there's some problem with that (I
> haven't done a lot of Python3-style IO yet), but I don't think there is, and
> if they are to be
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Laurens Van Houtven <_...@lvh.cc> wrote:
> It should really say something about protocol/transport separation early
>> on, though ;).
>>
>
> Pff, publishing finished work is for academics. Do you want me to be an
> academic, Glyph? Do you?
>
> I've added the stuff I
>
> It should really say something about protocol/transport separation early
> on, though ;).
>
Pff, publishing finished work is for academics. Do you want me to be an
academic, Glyph? Do you?
I've added the stuff I got from Jim. FlowControl seems to be the equivalent
of IPushProducer. Why does P
