I have a wxPython app that starts up a network-intensive process. I played
with wxReactor, but found the performance of the separate thread much better.
The GUI has very little interaction with the twisted thread. Once the network
process is done, I'm done with the services. At that point,
What's the larger problem you're trying to solve?
Jason
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:38 PM, wrote:
> I apologize in advance – another question about Twisted and threading. I
> just seem to have trouble with this and I’m hoping my example is simple
> enough that a good explanation will be forthcom
On 10:11 pm, p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
>On 02/17/2011 09:38 PM, andy.hens...@gtri.gatech.edu wrote:
>>My controlling thread just wants to start Twisted, let it do its
>>thing,
>>and then let the thread stop. Later on, I 19d like to do it again. In
>>the
>
>That's your problem. The reactor is
On 02/17/2011 09:38 PM, andy.hens...@gtri.gatech.edu wrote:
> My controlling thread just wants to start Twisted, let it do its thing,
> and then let the thread stop. Later on, I’d like to do it again. In the
That's your problem. The reactor is not, in general, restartable.
You need to start it o
I apologize in advance - another question about Twisted and threading. I just
seem to have trouble with this and I'm hoping my example is simple enough that
a good explanation will be forthcoming.
I'm trying to start and stop Twisted in its own thread, over and over. I've
seen some notes that
Hi everyone,
My group at ITA Software, Availability and Inventory Control, is looking
for an intern. Inventory Control in this context is a core part of an
airline's reservation system, and we are currently hard at work developing
for American Airlines:
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/ame
