On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Landreville
wrote:
> That's pretty much what I did as well.
Actually, it's *exactly* what you did. As mentioned, I posted your
solution from April :)
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:47 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz
wrote:
> If you want there to be a "recommended way", you can be
Hello
I try to write twisted based daemon that work in multiple workers, like
this:
from twisted.internet import reactor;
from proxy import FASTCGIServerProxyFactory;
import os;
reactor.listenUNIX("/tmp/twisted-fcgi.sock", FASTCGIServerProxyFactory());
for i in xrange(3):
l_pid = os.fork();
On Sep 1, 2010, at 1:16 AM, Einar S. Idsø wrote:
> Well, at least I've found that the interest in SOAP in the Twisted
> community is not very great ;) And understandably so. Unfortunately,
> however, sometimes Twisted apps do need to talk to alternative
> protocols, so it is a pity there's no rec
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 1:16 AM, Einar S. Idsø
wrote:
> Well, at least I've found that the interest in SOAP in the Twisted
> community is not very great ;) And understandably so. Unfortunately,
> however, sometimes Twisted apps do need to talk to alternative
> protocols, so it is a pity there's no
That is correct. In our case we've audited our code for transactions and all of
ours are single statement trans.
It's pretty typical for read/write splitting to forbid multiple-statement
transactions as a cost of doing it.
-J
Sent via iPhone
Is your e-mail Premiere?
On Sep 1, 2010, at 7:1
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Anton Gyllenberg wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Itamar Turner-Trauring
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 14:52 +0300, Anton Gyllenberg wrote:
>>
>>> Any comments and suggestions welcome!
>>
>> Unit tests are always a good idea :)
>
> That is so true. And
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Itamar Turner-Trauring
wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 14:52 +0300, Anton Gyllenberg wrote:
>
>> Any comments and suggestions welcome!
>
> Unit tests are always a good idea :)
That is so true. And if not writing new ones, then at least running
existing ones. That I
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 20:54 -0600, Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
> That's one way of handling it. Another way is to wrap the library so
> it does the splitting automatically. The advantage to the latter is
> not making mistakes where you accidentally use the READ connection for
> a write.
That sound
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 14:52 +0300, Anton Gyllenberg wrote:
> Any comments and suggestions welcome!
Unit tests are always a good idea :)
___
Twisted-Python mailing list
Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com
http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 07:16 +0200, Einar S. Idsø wrote:
> Well, at least I've found that the interest in SOAP in the Twisted
> community is not very great ;) And understandably so. Unfortunately,
> however, sometimes Twisted apps do need to talk to alternative
> protocols, so it is a pity there's n
> I do the primary work on the ldaptor Debian package these days. Tommy did not
> release a new version for years but has the mentioned git repository. The
> Debian svn repository at
> svn://svn.debian.org/python-modules/packages/ldaptor/trunk/ contains a series
> of patches in the debian/patches d
The LDAPEntryWithClient.search() method used to send the LDAP request with
a call like
self.client.send_multiResponse(... )
send_multiResponse() returns a deferred that was just discarded. If the
operation causes an error then the errback fired on the discarded deferred
will remain unhandle
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 01:13:33PM +0300, Anton Gyllenberg wrote:
> I want to use the Ldaptor LDAP client for a project. Does anybody know
> whether and how Ldaptor is currently maintained and what the best
> upstream source is? I need to make some changes and wonder what to
> base the work on and
I want to use the Ldaptor LDAP client for a project. Does anybody know
whether and how Ldaptor is currently maintained and what the best
upstream source is? I need to make some changes and wonder what to
base the work on and where to discuss and publish changes.
Is it OK to discuss Ldaptor on this
14 matches
Mail list logo
