On Mar 11, 2010, at 3:14 PM, Jonathan Lange wrote:
> Thank you very much Jean-Paul & Thomas!
I second this sentiment! I am *thrilled* that we're now on a released version
of trac, and I applaud the hard work that it took to get us there.
Hopefully now it will be easier for other people to hel
I ran into David Reid at PyCon a few weeks ago, and I showed him an index
of "easy" and "bitesize" bugs I'm putting on the web at
https://openhatch.org/search/. He told me that the Twisted team tags bugs
as "easy" in Trac.
So all you might like to see
https://openhatch.org/search/?q=Twisted&to
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 2:05 PM, wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thomas and I have finished upgrading the trac installation on
> http://twistedmatrix.com/ to 0.11.6. We expect that this will resolve a
> number of the issues the site has had.
>
> If you notice anything broken about the website now, please p
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 8:05 PM, wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thomas and I have finished upgrading the trac installation on
> http://twistedmatrix.com/ to 0.11.6. We expect that this will resolve a
> number of the issues the site has had.
>
> If you notice anything broken about the website now, please p
Hi all,
Thomas and I have finished upgrading the trac installation on
http://twistedmatrix.com/ to 0.11.6. We expect that this will resolve a
number of the issues the site has had.
If you notice anything broken about the website now, please point it
out.
Jean-Paul
__
Thomas Hervé wrote:
> Le jeudi 11 mars 2010 à 10:08 +, Chris Withers a écrit :
>> exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
>>> Also, I'm pretty sure that the 9.0 Windows installer _also_ didn't
>>> include zope.interface. So this isn't a new situation with 10.0.
Is zope.interface not used/requir
Le jeudi 11 mars 2010 à 10:08 +, Chris Withers a écrit :
> exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
> > Also, I'm pretty sure that the 9.0 Windows installer _also_ didn't
> > include zope.interface. So this isn't a new situation with 10.0.
> >> Is zope.interface not used/required anymore?
> >> If so,
exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
> Also, I'm pretty sure that the 9.0 Windows installer _also_ didn't
> include zope.interface. So this isn't a new situation with 10.0.
>> Is zope.interface not used/required anymore?
>> If so, why is it shipping in the non-windows version?
>
> It doesn't ship in