On Oct 25, 2009, at 1:50 AM, James Y Knight wrote:
On Oct 25, 2009, at 1:38 AM, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
What do you do? Well, the obvious upgrade path here is to make a
class which (A) inherits from "Library" to get Twisted
functionality and (B) inherits from "object" to get new-style-
ness
On Oct 25, 2009, at 1:38 AM, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
What do you do? Well, the obvious upgrade path here is to make a
class which (A) inherits from "Library" to get Twisted functionality
and (B) inherits from "object" to get new-style-ness. So you go
ahead and write:
# in your application
On Oct 24, 2009, at 10:50 AM, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
I think that we should consider requests to make specific classes new-
style (and grant them when doing so won't cause compatibility
problems),
make all new classes new-style, but otherwise leave this alone until
3.x
is widely a
On Oct 24, 2009, at 3:47 PM, Daniel Griffin wrote:
> I ported my thread based socket code to twisted and have been happy
> with my results. (...)
> Basically its a huge win on every level.
>
> Thanks for all the help everyone.
Glad to hear it! Do you want to write up something more specific fo
Bug summary
__
Summary for 2009-10-18 through 2009-10-25
Bugs opened: 2Bugs closed: 1 Total open bugs: 1183 (+1)
|== Type Changes |== Priority Changes |== Component Changes
|Defect: +1 |Normal: +1 |Mail: +1
|Enhancement: +1
Im looking at the common.py and I feel a bit confused about how to wrap a
resolver.
Would'nt a subclass achieve the same thing. I would only need to implement
the changed functions in the subclass.
I guess my problem is that I dont exactly know how to write a wrapper in
python.
Kind regards
Tax
Hi everyone,
I ported my thread based socket code to twisted and have been happy with my
results. To re-hash, my code creates a connection then waits for the other
end to do something and respond, each connection takes a different amount of
time. I went from 3-5 connections completed per second to
On 02:39 pm, k.kelly.gor...@gmail.com wrote:
>On Thu Oct 8 20:08:12 EDT 2009, Glyph Lefkowitz twistedmatrix.com> wrote:
>>On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Mark Visser
>>wrote:
>>
>> > I've been bitten a couple times by twisted's use of old-style
>>classes.
>> > Now that Jython is finally off the
On Thu Oct 8 20:08:12 EDT 2009, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Mark Visser wrote:
>
> > I've been bitten a couple times by twisted's use of old-style classes.
> > Now that Jython is finally off the 2.2 branch, is there any real reason
> > to stay backwards compatible?
>
