wow, ampoule looks like just what I need, and I think it will work
fine as-is.
Thanks for the help,
Ryan
On Oct 6, 2009, at 8:56 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Ryan Burns wrote:
Disregarding reasons of why I would want to do this, is this something
that is po
On Oct 6, 2009, at 11:25 PM, Andrew Bennetts wrote:
> Steve Steiner (listsin) wrote:
> [...]
>> I expect the usual flurry of "you must post your exact code or we
>> can't help you at all, moron" posts, but...
>
> I'll try to restrain myself ;)
Thanks, I appreciate your restraint. Must say
Hey Glyph thanks for responding so promptly! First if I understand correctly
on the server-side we have some code like:
def get_data_updates():
if (!has_updates):
return NO_DATA
return json.encode(the_updates)
and on the client side
def poll_for_updates():
while True:
respon
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Ryan Burns wrote:
> Disregarding reasons of why I would want to do this, is this something
> that is possible?
Absolutely. Here's an example that uses AMP rather than PB:
https://launchpad.net/ampoule
If AMP is OK, you can just use Ampoule as-is; if not,
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 11:30 PM, Stephen Mattison wrote:
> How can I implement this in Twisted?
>
You can use DeferredResource:
http://twistedmatrix.com/documents/8.2.0/api/twisted.web.util.DeferredResource.html
or you can return NOT_DONE_YET from Resource.render(), and hold on to the
reques
On Oct 6, 2009, at 10:57 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
However, you can experiment with it pretty easily using
DeferredSemaphore: http://twistedmatrix.com/documents/8.2.0/api/twisted.internet.defer.DeferredSemaphore.html
Cool, I didn't know about that, I'll give it a look. Thanks!
If your app
Hey guys I'm trying to implement some web-services over JSON-RPC, and one of
the methods needs to use server-push.
I will try and explain my problem as well as I can.
I have a client, which is an iPhone, natively running a JSON-RPC( or XML-RPC
) client implementation.
I need to do something like
Steve Steiner (listsin) wrote:
[...]
> I expect the usual flurry of "you must post your exact code or we
> can't help you at all, moron" posts, but...
I'll try to restrain myself ;)
> In spite of my not having posted specific code, could someone with
> some actual experience in t
If everything is happening in a single thread, you probably don't need to
lock anything, because there's no shared access and therefore no race
conditions. I have no idea how your app is written, so you may need them -
I don't know. Just an observation.
- Matt
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 11:13 PM,
Hi All,
I'm writing a twisted application where I'd like to run and
communicate with subprocesses that also happen to be twisted apps. I'm
wondering if I can somehow combine twisted's process and perspective
broker code so that I can launch a twisted server in a subprocess and
communicate
On Oct 6, 2009, at 11:00 PM, Matt Perry wrote:
> One thing of note is that you say you have concurrency issues
> handled -- but with asynchronous I/O, there are no concurrency
> issues, since there's no concurrency (at least, not at application
> level). This is confusing at first but it's
Your limit will usually be the number of file descriptors in the system,
which can be usually changed via ulimit or your system's equivalent. On
Linux I believe it defaults to 1024, so you should be able to handle 1024
simultaneous connections.
One thing of note is that you say you have concurren
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Steve Steiner (listsin) <
list...@integrateddevcorp.com> wrote:
>Should I limit the number of "in-flight" pages?
>
I'm not going to comment on that, because I don't know what your app is
doing or why it appears to be dying. As you said, you didn't post c
So, I have a situation...
I have an application whose basic function is, in simplified form:
def main():
get_web_page(main_page_from_params)
def get_web_page(page_name):
set up a page getter deferred,
one of the call
On 12:00 am, as...@impactdamage.com wrote:
>Using the current trunk r27366 (which is after #4014 fixed a related
>issue), I am having trouble with an implementation of web.guard wrapped
>XMLRPC. This is a new test implementation to expose both a soap and
>xmlrpc
>interface. SOAP works, but xmlrp
Using the current trunk r27366 (which is after #4014 fixed a related
issue), I am having trouble with an implementation of web.guard wrapped
XMLRPC. This is a new test implementation to expose both a soap and xmlrpc
interface. SOAP works, but xmlrpc throws UnsupportedMethod POST.
Here is my
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Kevin Horn wrote:
>
> FYI: I've hacked together a simple "lorelint" script to automatically check
> for these type of issues. Happy to share if anyone thinks it might be
> useful for future release mgmt automation or whatever.
>
For benefit of future readers...Lo
Hi,
calling in client code self.cred.login() I can't print login result.
What I'm doing wrong? login method returns deffered, but should yield
result from callRemote method.
Thanks for any help!
Pet
class Cred:
@inlineCallbacks
def login(self):
proxy = Proxy(LOGIN_PROXY)
Dear phil
> true, depending on your needs, this may be all that you need. from
> your description, though, it sounds like you'd be doing this
> authentication step in every resource you want to protect, which could
> become tedious (aka error-prone) in a big project.
I do have lots of resources to
19 matches
Mail list logo
